VOLUME II. NEW-YORK, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1843. NUMBERS 9 & 10. Write the vision, and make it plarh upon tables, that he may run that readeth it. For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie ; though it tarry, wait for it ; because it will surely come, it will not tarry." BY JOSHUA V. HIMES. THE MIDNIGHT CRY—WEEKLY. Published every Friday, by J. V. HIMES. Assisted by L. D FLEMING and N. SOUTHARD. TERMS FOR THREE MONTHS. Two copies, by mail, for $1 00 Fivo " " 2 00 Twenty-six, " 10 00 Orders (enclosing the money) should be addressed to J V. Himes, 36 Park 1 tow. New York. THE MIDNIGHT CRY. THIS PAPER Is sent, gratis, to the clerk of nearly every Baptist Church in the Union, the name of which is in the Trien- nial Register. We hope it will be read and compared with the Scripture by ministers and people. It may be had lor circulation at $4 per hundred. BROTHER BERNARD, Whose letter appears to-day, is well known as the publisher ofthe revised Version of the Bible. It is only a few weeks since he commenced a thorough examina- tion of the subject. He was " more noble" than some, in that he received the word with all readiness of mind and searched the Scriptures daily, whether these things were so. He speedily saw the light, and gladly embrac- ed it, without waiting to inquire how much reproach those who Jove this present world might heap upon him We trust all who read his letter will follow his example. CONFERENCE IN N. Y. After the close ofthe Conference in Philadelphia, we expect to commence one in New York, of which we shall give more full notice hereafter. OUR NEXT PAPER Will contain but 8 pages, unless the Lord shall send us the means of printing a large sheet, without incurring debt. We are very anxious to insert a Review of Prof, Stuart, by Wm. Miller, a brief Reply to Mr. Dowling, and many other important articles. LECTURES IN NEW YORK. Brother Geo. Storrs, providence permitting, will lec- ture at Niblo's Saloon to-morrow (Saturday) at three o'clock and at 7 o'clock, P. M. which will close his labors there. He will also lecture at the corner of Catharine and Madison streets, on the Sabbath, morning, afternoon and evening, at the usual hours, which will probably end his public labors in New York. LECTURES IN BROOKLYN. Brother T. Hyatt will commence a course of lectures next Sabbath morning, at 10 o'clock, at the National Hall, Brooklyn. Meeting In Jamaica, Vt. Brother S. C. Chandler, whose labors were so abun- dantly blessed in this vicinity, has commenced a series of meetings in Jamaica, Vt., with very cheering prospects. A New Paper in Ohio- Brother Fitch has issued, at Cleveland, one number of a paper called the " Second Advent of Christ." It is nearly filled with " The Restoration of the kingdom to Israel," a timely antidote to the Judaizing doctrines so prevalent among those who profess to be followers of Him who came to break down the middle wall of par- ition and make all one in Him. WEEKLY—NO. 36 PARK-ROW. CHEER!NO LETTERS. From the hundreds of letters recently received, wecan publish only a few brief extracts. They comedo us daily from various quarters, calling for light. Of four letters received yesterday morning, one ordered 26 papers, week" ly. in Ontario, Wayne, and Yates counties in this State. One from Ohio, another from Michigan, and another from Georgia, enclosed money for publications, which we gladly sent The P. M. in Georgia, says :—" I re- ceived a copy of the Midnight Cry, lately, but there are so many persons wishing to read it, that I have not had an opportunity of reading it myself." A brother in Bridgeport, Ct., writes :— " Brother H. A. Chittenden visited our city the 12th inst., and commenced a course of seven lectures, which resulted in the commencement of a most glorious work of grace. Scores have been induced to look to God for par- don of sins, and have found plenteous redemption in a once crucified Savior, and scores more are saying : ' What shall we do to be saved V while thousands are rejoicing that the Midnight Cry has been sounded in Bridgeport." Brother Chittenden himself writes thus :— I have been in Bridgeport and Danbury since I left New York The good Lord has revived his- work most gloriously in the former place. Probably from 150 to 200 have found the Saviour precious to their souls. Danbury was a very hard place, but some souls were hopefully converted, and I expect to hear great things from that town soon A story was started ot my death at Danbury while lecturing. which made considerable of a stir in Bridgeport, New Haven and Hartford, (Where it was announced in the Churches with appropriate remarks) and in the neighboring towns. It was a complete' hoax- made out of whole cloth. I spoke in this city, [Hartford] last evening, to a crowded house, and am going into the country this even- ing. I am often astonished at the apparent success of my labors, a revival always follows, for which bless the Lord. Brother Stoddard, a Second Advent lecturer, is speak- ing with great success ; the blessing follows truth. But O how few will be ready when the Lord shall come ! From tho Disciple. PREPARE TO MEET THY GOD. Reader, that meeting is an event you are certainly to experience ! And it is soon to occur—how very soon, who can tell! Every step you take carries you towards it. Every pulse bears your spirit on towards its mee;ing with Him who gave it, and placed it in this life to glorify and enjoy him. Have you done it '! Are-you doing it ? Only your frail breath that is in your nostrils detains you from that meeting with your God, to render the account of your stewardship. Your mortal life, your flesh and blood, is the curtain between you and the visible presence of Him who is a consuming fire to the guilty. That cur- tain will quickly drop—it may drop to-day—this hour— and your spirit sensibly meet Him who is a spirit. That meeting will be, on your part, ineffable bliss, if you are prepared for it. If unprepared, it will overwhelm you in agonizing remorse and eternal despair. O prepare for it NOW, while yet you may.' The golden moments of probation may run out even sooner than the few remain- ing pulsations of your mortal life. Time itself may end even sooner than your frail breath, in the coming of the Judge of the living and the dead—who will say it will not be this day, this hour. Prepare to meet thy God ! Re- pent—abandon all your sins, fully and forever. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and receive the baptism of the Holy Ghost, unto the full sanctification of soul, body and spirit. Love God with all the heart, and your neighbor as yourself. Break off all fellowship with wickedness, and be ready to every good work. " Be ye holy, for the Lord your God is holy." Without holiness you are un- prepared to meet him. Yet you must meet him—and O, how soon ! Delay not a moment. Prepare ! Prepare! PREPARE! # READ AND CH1CLLATE. LETTER OF DAVID BERNARD. (A BAPTIST MINISTER,) ON THE SECOND COMING OF JESUS CHRIST. JANS 2d, A. D., 1813. * Very Dear Friend,—It is with feelings of deep and overwhelming interest, that I address you on the subject of CHRIST'S SECOND PERSON- AL ADVENT FROM HEAVEN. Yotl, doubtless, profess to believe this important truth of Di- vine Revelation. It is there recorded in plain and explicit terms. But, with the great mass of men, you may have, until now, felt, " my Lord delayeth his coming." With them, you may have supposed that God has given us no intimation in his word of the time when this event will happen. You may have been kept in ignorance of the truth, by a wrong apprehen- sion of Christ's words—"of that day and hour knoweth no man"—and the false opinion that " Prophecies are not to be understood until after their accomplishment." If the words of Christ refer to the end of time, (which some doubt,) may they not accord with the ev«nt be- ing made known to the People of God previous to the appearing of our Lord ? Or is that day to come upon them unawares ? There is a pre- diction in Daniel, xii; 4—9, which many- believe refers to this event: the words (per- haps the import of them) were to ' be shut up' (kept secret) and sealed, " until the time of the end." Hence, at the time of the Saviour's in- carnation the lime of the event was not known— for the " ikne ofthe end" had not then come. But if the time of the end has now come, or in other words, if we are on the eve of the time when the Lord is to appear—though the " wicked will do wickedly and none of the wicked shall under- stand,'' nitty it not be possible, as Daniel says, that the " wise shall understand ?" (Dan. 12 : 10.) And does not the Apostle say, "but ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that, that day should overtake you as a thief ?" Is it not possible, that there is a mistake concerning the time not being known? The wisest of unin- spired -men have erred on other subjects. May it not be possible that they have been in error on this subject also? And is it not strange, that those very persons, however wise, who contend that "we can know nothing about the time " and that " prophecies are not to be un- derstood until after their accomplishment," are perpetually, in their prayers, and sermons, and missionary publications, interpreting the pro- phecies ! They predict, or say, that the prophe- cies predict, a time of universal peace and pros- perity in the church and in the world. How do they know this, if the prophecies are not to be understood until after their fulfilment ? They say, moreover, that this universal peace and prosperity will continue for one thousand years., and that then there will be a declension by the influence of Satan, who wiil be 44 loosed out of his prison and go out to deceive the nations, (see Rev. 20 ch.) and that then will the end come. Now, do not those who entertain these views not only interpret the prophecies, but also declare that the time will be known ? If this is to be the order of events, it will not be difficult, I think, to know the time. But is it certain that the Bible teaches this doctrine ? Most of the ancient Fathers did not believe it. Martin Lu- ther did not. He believed that the end would come before 1846. Dr. Gill did not believe it— nor did*Cotton Mather. They thought that the end of all things was at hand ! The scriptures, which, it is believed, inculcate the doctrine of a temporal millennium .1 have carefully examined, and there is no evidence at all satisfactory to my mind, that they will admit of such an inter- pretation. It is true that the heathen are to be given to Christ for an inheritance, but the same scripture informs us that he will break them to pieces with a rod (sceptre) of iron—will dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel, (Ps.. 2 : 8, 9.) It is also true that the Gospel was to have been preached in all the world for a testimony to all nations before the end should come," (Matt. 24: 14.) But has not this been done already ? Was it not " preached every where" to " every creature under heaven?" So says the Bible. That scripture had its literal ac- complishment before the destruction of Jerusa- lem. And it has had a second accomplishment, (if that were necessary,) since that event ; for it has been prsached in the four quarters of the glube, for a witness to all nations, of the mercy and grace of God. The angel who was seen flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel lo preach to them who dwell on the earth, to " eve- ry nation and tribe and tongue and people"— cried fear God and give glory to him, for the hour of his judgment is come." Is there not rea- son to believe that this angel is now fulfilling his commission ? If so, the judgment is near! The Bible says, " the kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and his Christ, and he will reign forever and ever.'' But this is after the sounding of the seventh trumpet, (which is the' last,) at which time " the nations are enraged, and the wrath of God is come, and the time of the dead that they should be judged, and that God should reward his ser- vants, the prophets, and the saints, and those who fear him, both small and great, and should destroy those who destroy the earth."—(ilev. 11 : 15—18.) There are other scriptures frequently addu- ced, like Is. ch. 25, to prove a temporal millenni. um. But it seems to me the language is too strong, and the blessings predicted too full and perfect for a temporal reign of Christ; for, while the prophet says, that God will make " unto all people a feast of fat things, and will destroy the vail that is cast over all nations1'—he declares that he will SWALLOW UP DEATH IN VICTORY— will wipe away the tears from all faces, and will take cCway the rebuke of his people from all the earth," And at this time the sun will be confounded and the moon ashamed when the Lord dwel'eth in Mount Zion before his ANCIENTS gloriously," (See Is. ch 24.) Will not such language apply with more propriety to a celestial than to a temporal reign of the Messiah ? There are many who still cherish the idea that the Jews are to be restored to their nation- al land ; and others, that they will be converted. But I cannot entertain, for a moment, the faith,' that God will restore Judaism, which he has long since abolished—nor that the Jews, as a nation, are to be converted. " All Israel will be saved." " The Deliverer will turn away un- godliness from Jacob." But Israel has not ob- tained that which they have sought—but the election has obtained it, and the rest are blinded." " He is a Jew who is one inwardly and circum- scision is of the heart-.'''' " If Ave are Christ's, < then we are Abraham's seed and heirs according to the promise," The limits of this letter will not permit a full and through investigation of the whole subject. But I wish to say enough to induce you to ex- amine it for yourself, if God has given us any intimations concerning the time of the world's destruction, it is very important that we should understand them. He informed Noah, 120 years before the flood, when he would destroy the world. Our Lord informed his disciples of the approaching destruction which awaited Jerusalem—of the signs which should precede it, and that the event should not extend beyond that generation. And it. is not contrary to rea- son, nor the character of God's general govern ment, nor revelation itself, for him to inform us when he will destroy the world by a deluge of fire. The only question is, has he done it 1 Let us examine the subject candidly, carejully, and prayerfully, and then judge. Please to read carefully the entire book of Daniel. You will learn that the 4 great image ' of Nebuchadnezzar's vision, as in'erpreted by Daniel, represents the four great monarchies which succeeded each other—which exercised universal empire, and are the*Babvlonian—tl\e ' Medo-Persian'—the Grecian and the Roman : That the vision of Daniel in the 7th ch., repre- sents the same as that of Nebuchadnezzar : And that the one in the 8th ch., is nearly analogous to the other—with the exception, that in the last, the Babylonian kingdom is not represented. I wish you to observe, that the ' great image,' representing the four great monarchies, was dashed all to pieces by a stone, cut out without hands, which stone, (the kingdom of God,) " fill- ed the whole earth." And that the "little horn" (Dan. 7 : 8—11,) was succeeded by the coming of the "ANCIENT OF DAYS"—the slaying, destruction and burning of the Beast. And also, that that same " horn (7:21, 22,) " made war with the saints and prevailed against them until the Ancient of days came, and judg- ment was given to the saints of the Most High ; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom." How strikingly does all this accord with the account given by Paul, (2 Thess. ch. 2, of the " man of sin" and his destruction by the coming of Christ! In each and every instance, where the Roman power is spoken of, it is represented as being de- stroyed by the coming of the Lord ! The " Man of Sin"—the " Papal power," then is to continue until the ".end of the world." How little does this accord with the doctrine of a "Temporal Millennium !" It seems that Daniel had a strong desire to know something which had not been told him, concerning the vision. What was this 1 Every thing had been explained, except the time when the 2300 days commenced. It was on this point, then, he desired information. To in- struct him, Gabriel was commissioned : "Un- derstand the matter," said he, "and consider the vision." What matter? What vision? Cer- tainly, the one which had already been the sub- ject of his thoughts and desires. What follows, (Daniel 9 : 24-27,) is not avision, but an explana- tion of the one already seen. In making all this plain, Gabriel gives him additional informa- tion, by which, also, the certainty of the vision and its end can be demonstrated. "Seventy weeks are determined, (cut off, it should be rendered, for the Hebrew will not on- ly justify it, but requires it—so say some of our best Hebrew scholars,) on thy people," &c.— The seventy weeks are 490 days. "Days," in Daniel's prophecies, says New ton, "are put for years." These 490 years, then, are cutoff [rom the 2300 years. And as these 490 years are a part of the 2300, being cut off from them, and com- menced at the time of the Decree of Artaxerxes, King of Persia, to restore Jesusalem. (see Ezra,') which was 457 years before the birth of Christ —the 2300 years commenced at that time, (457 B. C. or 490 years before the death of Christ,) which will bring us down to 1843. In the year 1843, then the "Sanctuary will be cleansed."' But what sanctuary is this," that is to be cleansed in 1843 ? A sanctuary is a place of worship. Under the Jewish dispensation, the Tabernacle, the Temple, and Jerusalem it- self, were places of worship. Under the Chris- tian dispensation, the place of worship is not restricted to any particular place—the world itself is the sanctuary of the Lord. And this is-evident from Ex. 15: 17. Hence the earth is to be purified. "The elements will tnelt with fervent heat," and "we," according to hi3 prom- ise "look for a new heaven and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness." (See 2 Pe- ter, ch. 4.) The other numbers in Daniel seem to corres- pond with the above. The "time, times and dividing of time," in Dan. 7 : 25, and the "time, times and a half," in Dan. 12 : 7, doubtless ie. fer to the same period spoken of in Rev, 11 : 2,3. This is 1,260 years—the reign of Anti- christ. In other words, the time of the Papal supremacy commenced in 538, and ended in 1798, when the sceptre of the Pope was broken —he being taken captive and imprisoned by the French. The 1290 days in Dan. 12 : 11, may com- mence in 508, when Pagan Rome ended, by the conversion of the 10 Pagan Kings, and the commencement of the first Papal war. The Pagan Rites were then abolished, and the " abomination that maketh desolate," or the Papal power, began with a strong hand to persecute the saints. The 1290 days end in 1798. "Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the 1335 days," (Dan 12: 12 ) This period very naturally commences in 508, as no other time is given—and ends in 1843. At this time, (at the end of the days, 1843,) Daniel is to "stand in his lot," (Dan 12 : 13.) Now if we are not to expect a Temporal Mil- lennium before the coming of Christ, and the four great kingdoms with their descendants are to be dashed to pieces j.nd pass away, so that there will be found no place for them—and the stone, which is the kingdom of God, is to fill the whole earth, and to stand forever—and the termination of this vision is to be in 1843, is there not reason to expect immediately the coming of the Lord ? The time of the cleansing of the Sanctuary—the time when Dauiel will stand in his lot, seem to be the same, and all those are made blessed, who wait for, and attain it. What can all this mean but the end of the world—the resurrection of the dead—the com- ing of the Lord ? But the "wicked will do wickedly, and none of the wicked shall understand—but the om Professor Olmsted's Writings, of the falling Stars. " The extent of the shower of 1833, was such as to cover no inconsiderable part of the EARTH'S SURFACE, from the middle of the Atlantic on the East, to the Pacific on the West; and from the Northern coast of South Ameri- ca, to undefined regions among the British possessions on the North, the exhibition of shooting stars was not only visible, but every where presented nearly one and the same appearance."(l) " The duration and maximum, or period of greatest display, were characterized by a similar uniformity. In nearly all places, the meteors began to attract notice by their unusual frequency as early PS eleven o'clock, and increased in numbers and splendor until about 4 o'clock, from which time they gradually declined, but were visible till lost in the light of.day. The meteors did not fly at ran- dom over all parts of the sky, but appeared to emanate fiorn a point in the constellation Leo, near a star called Gamma Leonis, in the bend of the sickle. " A similar phenomenon was witnessed on the 12th of November, 1799, and at the same season of the ye;r in 1830, 183 f, and 1832. The meteoric shower was r< peaf- ed on the morning of Nov. 13th or 14th, for si veral years, but on a scale constantly diminishing until 1838, since which time the exhibitions have been too lit'.Je re- markable to be worthy of particular not ice. " I feel assured that this is 110 atmospheric or terrestrial phenomenon, but that these fiery meteors come to us from the region of space, and reveal to us the existence of worlds of a nebulous or cometary nature, existing in the solar system, and forming constituent parts of that system. Nor are these conclusions built on mere hypotheses, but are necessary inferences from certain facts. " The present generation may consider itself privileged in having witnessed grander displays of fiery meteors, than are to be found recorded on the pages of hhtory.'' " In displays of the Aurora Borealis, also, we have been similarly favored. Such visitations of this spectacle, cs we have enjoyed since Aug. 1827, to the present time, are by no means of constant occurrence." " Those who were st» fortunate as to witness the ex- hibition of shooting stars on the morning of Nov. 13th, 1833, probably saw the GREATEST DISPLAY of celtstial.fire- works that has ever been seen since the creation of the world, or at least within the annals covered by the pages of liis- tory.(2) " This is no longer to he regarded as a terrestial, but as a celestial phenomenon ; and shooting stars are now i to be no more viewed as casual productions of the upper i regions of the atmosphere, but as visitants from OTHER WORLD?, or from the •planetary voids.' j " Subsequent enquiries have led me to the belief, that the body was so distant as hardly to exhibit any ap- ! parent parallax, but was projected on very nearly the same part of the sky by all observers. This fact at once shows that the source of the meteors was far beyond the atmosphere, and confirms the preceding conclusion, that it was wholly'independent of the earth." (3) NOTES BY H. JONES. (1) From my OH n researches and enquiries, I am satis- fied that this testimony is correct in regard to the vast extent of territory, over which those wonders were ex- hibited. The witnesses of the phenomenon, therefore, are too numerous and two well agreed as to the " fearful" appearance of the sight to admit of its ever being regarded as unworthy of a place in the fulfilling of prophetic " wonder in the heavens," &c (•2) No doubt, as the Professor observes. " The present generation," has " witnessed grander displays offiery me- teors" and " the GREATEST DISPLAY of celestial fire works," ever seen by mortals; because, occasionally they have seemingly brought before our very eyes, the fiery appearance of the last day, " when the heavens being on fire, shall be dissolved," " and the stars of hea- ven fall unto the earth," &c. Therefore, above all who have gone before, it becomes us to tremble at such ful- filled words of the Lord, and prepare without delay for his soon coming in "flamingfire," &c. (3) Though it does not seem logical to suppose, as Professor O. does, that the falling stars are " visitants from OTHER WORLD*," we may suppose with him that their " source" " was far beyond the atmosphere," " and wholly independent of the earth." Then should not frail men. who " are but of yesterday and know nothing," cease their attempts to give a philosophical or second cause for that astonishing, very alarming and foretold wonder of 1833 ! But when the Almighty is thus speak- ing as with a voice of thunder and terrible alarm, not only by his word long ago given, but by its present strik- ing fulfilment, in showing his coming to judgment at hand; does it not now specially become us all to "Be still and know that" he is " God," and that he " will" soon " be exalted in the earth," the " new earth," in the establishment of his everlasting kingdom1? A NEW YEAR'S ADDRESS TO SECOND ADVENT BELIE VEU3, FOIL 1843. BY WILLIAM MILLER. DEAR BRETHREN :—This year, acco/ding to our faith, is the last year that Satan will reisn in our earth. Jesus Christ will come, and bruise his head. The kingdoms of the earth will be dashed to pieces, which is the same thing. Anil he whose right it is to reign, will take the kingdom and possess it forever and ever. And the God of peace shall "tread Satan under your feet shortly." Therefore we have but a little time more to do as our good brother Paul was commanded, Acts xxvi, 18, " To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me." Let us then put forth our best energies in this cause, let every one of us try by persuasion, by the help and grace of God, to get one at least of our friends to come to Christ, in this last year of redemption, and if we succeed, what an army of regenerated souls may we not hail in the new heavens and new earth. I pray God, tny brethren, that nothing may deter you from this work. Let scoffers scoff, and liars tell lies, we must not suffer ourselves to be drawn from this work. Yes, the glorious work of salvation, will, within a few short months, be finished forever. Then I need not e>hortyou more on this point—you yourselves know the value of this great salvation. And another thing it is well for„us to remember. The world will watch for our halting. They cannot think we believe what we speak, for they count our faith a strange faith, and now beware and not give'them any advantage of ground over us. They will perhaps look for the halting and falling away of many. But I hope none who are looking for the glorious appearing, will let their faith waver. Keep cool, let patience have its perfect work, that after ye have done the will of God, ye may receive the promises. This year will try our faith, we must be tried, purified and made white, and if there should be any among us, who do not in heart believe, they will go out from us : but I am persuaded there can- not be many, for it is a doctrine so repugnant to the car- nal heart, so opposite to the worldly minded, sofar from the cold professor, the bigot and hypocrite, that none of them will, or can believe in a doctrine so searching as the im- mediate appearing of Jesus Christ to judge the world. I am therefore persuaded better things of you, brethren, although I thus speak. I beseech you, my dear brethren, be careful that Satan get no advantage over you by scat- tering coals of wild fire among you ; for if he cannot drive YOU into unbelief and doubt, he will then try his wild fire of fanaticism and speculation, to get us off from the word of God. Be watchful and sober, and hope to the end, for the grace that shall be brought unto you at the revelat'on of Jesus Christ. Think not, my brethren, that I stand in doubt of your perseverance. I know your faith, your love, and hope., to be rooted and grounded on the word of the Almighty. You are not dependant on the wisdom or commandments of men ; many, if not all of you have examined for your- selves, you have studied and found true, what at first was only reported unto you. You have found the Bible much more precious than you had before conceived—its doc- trine to be congenial with the holy and just character of God—its precepts to be wise, benevolent and kind—its prophecies to be clear, and lucid, carrying conviction strong of the truth and inspiration of the Scriptures, a harmony of manner, and matter, from Genesis to Reve- lation. In one word, you have found a new Bible, and I hope and believe you have read it with new delight. I fear not that you can ever be satisfied with the views of our opponents. The manner of explaining Scripture, which they adopt, is too carnal to satisfy the devoted child of God. Then let me advise a continual searching for the truth, both for faith and practice, and wherever we have wan- dered from the word of God, let us come back to the primitive simplicity of the gospel once delivered to the saints. Thus we shall be found ready at his coming to give an account of our stewardship, and hear our blessed Master say. " Well done thou good and faithful servant, enter thou into the joy of thy Lord." Every fruth We get from the blessed book prepares us better for his com- ing and kingdom. Every error prevents us, in part, from being ready. Let us then stand strong in the faith, with our loins girt al->out with truth, and our lamps trimmed and burn- ing, and waiting for our Lord, ready to enter the promis- ed land, the true inheritance of the saints. This year, the fulness of time will come, the shout of victory will be heard in heaven, the triumphant return of our'great Cap- tain may be expected ; the new song will commence before the throne; eternity begin its revolution, and time shall be no more. This year, oh blessed year ! the captives will be released ; the prison doors will be open- ed, death will have no more dominion over us, and life, eternal life, be our everlasting reward. This year, a glorious year ! ! The trump of Jubilee will be blown, the exiled children will return, the pil- grims teach their home, from earth and heaven the scat- tered remnant come, and meet in middle air ;—the fath- ers before the flood, Noah and his sons, Abraham and his, the Jew and Gentile, a;i who have died in faith, of every nation, kindred, tongue and people, will meet to part no more. This year, the long looked for year of years, the best, it is come.—I shall hope to meet you all. through faith in God, and the blood of the Lamb.—Until then, farewell. May God bless you, and sustain you in the faith. May you be patient in all tribulation and endure unto the end. May you this year be crowned with immortal- ity and glory. And finally, my brethren, " T pray God, your whole soul, and spirit, and body be prt*served blameless, unto the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ." W. M. Low Hampton, Jan. 1, 1843. IECTPRE AT BROADWAY TABERNACLE. Last Sabbath evening, Mr. Andrews, Pastor of the Congregational Church in the Broadway Tabernacle, gave a discourse on the Second Advent. That spacious building was densely thronged. To say the least, his dis- course was lucid, convincing, and solemn. He took his text from the 20th of llev., and went on to prove the doctrine of a thousand years of glorious tri- umph to the church, when Christ should descend and crush the kingdoms of this earth, as. a " potter's vessel," and live and reign with his people in this glorified state. He then presented a multitude of ancient and modern writers, from the apostles down to Sir' Isaac Newton, Dr. Gill, Fletcher, etc., to show that this doctrine was both old and new, that it was not disputed in the church till the third century- that it was ever a kind of anchor, when in persecution, that Christ should again come as a Judge, and put his enemies under his feet, and that the disciples were exhorted " to comfort one another with • these words." Few could have passed away, without being instructed if not convicted, of the truth, that Christ is marshalling his host for the great battle of the Lord God Almighty, and " who shall be abls to stand !" Who can abide the day of his coming 1 It is too late in the day for the church to be spinning her spider-web net of a spiritual millennium, introduced by Sabbath-schools, Bible-classes, tracts, and the multi- plication of splendid churches : for while they are " busied here and there," the portals of the sky may open upon them, and manifest to their astonished eyes, the King in all his power and glory. The above was written two weeks ago. Last Sabbath, Mr. Andrews lectured again, on the Scriptural argument, and showed conclusively that Chrises coming will be personal, introducing the perfect millennium on the new earth. He agrees with Dr. Chalmers, whose eloquent sermon on this subject, we published last week. The Tabernacle, which holds about 4000 persons, was crowded, and multitudes were going away long before the lecture commenced, for want of room. He continues the subject two weeks from next Sabbath evening. REMARKS ON DANIEL'S VISIONS. In the Lord's teaching, he gives precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little and there a little. Thus to Daniel, he repeated truth under different symbols, all harmonizing, but some of them enlarging on one point, and sjome on another. Christ refers to a thing foretold by "Daniel THE PROPHET," as yet to come when he spoke, and says; " Whoso readeth let him understand." To these sure words of prophecy we " do well that we take heed, as unto a LIGHT, shining in a dark place." When the mighty Nebuchadnezzar " was troubled with dreams," and sought the meaning, " then was the secret made known to Daniel in a night vision." Nebu- chadnezzar, js king of Babylon, was the head of " fine gold." In Isaiah 14: 4, Babylon is called " the golden city." Its wealth was immense. Its power reached " wherever the children of men dwelt." After the head of gold arises " ANOTHER KINUDOM." That was the Medo- Persian kingdom, for when " Belshazzar the king" was "weighed in the balance and found wanting," "his kingdom was given to the Medes and Persians." Grecia was the third kingdom which " bare rule over all the earth ;" for the Bible and common history show that Per- sia was subdued by Grecia. Then come the iron legs, which "BREAK IN PIECES AND BRUISE." Mat- thew Henry says : " The Roman kingdom was strong as iron ; witness the prevalency of that kingdom against all that contended with it for many ages. It broke in pieces the Grecian empire.1' Toward the latter end of it, it grew very weak, and branched into ten kingdoms, which were at the toes of these feet. Some of them were weak as clay—others strong as iron-" Nebuchadnezzar saw this image, till a stone cut out without hands, smote the image upon the feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces ; then all those solid metals became like chaff, and the wind carried them away, and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth. This represents the fact, that when the Roman empire has been divided into ten king- doms, " the God of heaven shall set up a kingdom which shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and 11' shall stand FOREVER." Here we have "the DESTRUCTION of all earthly kingdoms to be followed immediately by the setting up of Christ's everlasting kingdom, that kingdom of which the rich in faith are now " heirs,'" and which they will " IN- HERIT" when Christ shall come in the clouds of heaven. See Matt. 25 : 34. Forty-eight years afterwards Daniel saw the same kingdoms, which, to the earthly-minded king appeared as an image " whose brightness was excellent." To him they appeared as four beasts ; three of them were among the most ferocious which God ever created, and the fourth more terrible still. These powers prevail till " the judgment is set," with wondrous pomp, "and the books are opened," Then it is that the fourth " beast is slain and his body destroyed and given to the burning flame." Concerning the rest of the beasts, we learn that their iives were prolonged when their dominion ws>3 taken away. The nations which composed the first three em- pires continued to exist though the dominion passed lrom one to the other till Rome "devoured the whole earth." Rome will iule, either as a consolidated empire, or in its ten divisions, or by its papal power, till, at the judgment, its lile and its dominion cease together. Three expressive phrases describe its end. It is slain, its body destroyed, being consumed by the burning flame. Pas-ing into the 8th chapter we find Babylon left out, for the best of reasons, but Medo-Persia, Greece and Rome retained, and the angel who explains the vision says : " I will make thee know what shall be in the LAST END of the indignation ;" and, " At the time of the end shall be the vision," and, " At the TIME APPOINTED shall THE END be." See Clue to the Time, for a further elucidation of this subject. Read Daniel II, VII and VIII. "Whoso readeth, let him UNDERSTANDS "NOTED IN THE SCRIPTURES OF TRUTH," "FOR OUR LEARNING." BABYLONIAN EMPIRE, B. (3, 677. In its glory, it was like a lion, soaring with wings as the eagle. But in Bel- shuzzar's time, it had lost its wings and ; its lion-heari, becoming feeble and faint. MEDO-PERSIAN EMPIRE. B. C. 538. The two arms meeting irone breast.—the bear raising up me side, or dominion,—and the ram with two horns, are all pproprwte emblems of Medo-Persia. » The Syrian bear, In • rength and ferocity scarcely yields to the lion," savs Pixtn». Ancient historians st gniatize the Medes and Persians as the g eate.-t robbers and spoil- ers that ever oppressed the nations." 1 hi: bear repre- sents the nature of the monarchy,but. the ram with two horns was its well- Si, known national emblem. GRECIAN EMPIRE, B. C. 331, This was founded by Alexander. It was like the laopnrd, xctive, crafty and cruel. The lion h id 2 wines, but the leopard had 4,—Grecia being moro rapid in its conquests than Babylon. But the goat was the known embh-ra of Rreece. It came against the ram with incredible swiftness, making up in speed what it lacked in size. Alexander conquered Persia with a very small army. J ROMAN EMPIRE, B. C. 158. " Behold, a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of IRON, and his nails of brass ; it devoured, and brake in pieces, and STAMPED the residue With the feet of it It had ten horns." Daniel saw the vision of the ram, he-goat, and exceed- ing great horn, two years after he saw the representa- tions ofthe four heasts. According to Lightfoot, Town- send, and other eminent chronologers, it was after the fall of Babylon ; hence he was " inTShushan," the capi- tal of Persia. Babylon being then a subject of history, had no place in this prophecy. " Behold, a ram which had two horns, and the two horns were high, but the h;gher came up last." The ram which came from the east, with its two horns, was Me- dia and Persia ; and the rough goat which darted upon him from the west, was Grecia:—so said the angel. The Grecian empire was at first united, as is represented by the single horn of the goat. It was afterwards divided into four parts, represented by the four horns, of which the angel said—" Four KINGDOMS shall stand up out ofthe nation," Here we are taught, in the plainest man- ner, that a horn in this vision means a kingdom. MEDO-PERSLA. GRECIA. "I considered the horns, and behold there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots -.—that horn had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout Tor who was more mighty, as Luther's German Bible reads] than his fellows." Papacy. "I beheld, even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame." That the power which is described next after these is Rome, is evident from these and many other reasons. 1. It rises " In the latter part of their kingdom,"—-that is, of the four kingdoms. So did Rome, as far as its place in the prophecy is concerned. Its connection with the Jews commenced 158 years before Christ. 2. It was " of fierce countenance." So tvas Rome — See Deut. 28 : 49, 50. 3. It was "little" at first. So was Rome. 4. It waxed " exceeding great," towards the east and towards the south." So did Rome. " From this horn increasing towards the south and east, particularly Sir j§aac Newton sagaciously infers, that it arose in the northwest corner of the Goat s dominion i. e. in Italy,—which points directly to the Romans." ' 4. It cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground* So did Rome;—persecuting Christians, Apos- tles and ministers of Jesus, % no other power ever did 6. "He magnified himself even to the Prince of the host So did Rome, when the Pope became the " head of all the churches." But the margin reads more pro- perly, " He magnified himself AG.MXST the PRINCE of the host, ' and in the interpretation the angel says • " He shall stand up against the PRINCE of princes'." Thus d'd Rome, when both Herod and Pontius Pilate con- spired against the holy Jesus. 7. " He shall destroy wonderfully, and shall destroy the mighty and holy people." Thus did Rome, 8. " He shall be broken without hand," So will Rome. (See oh. 2.) " Broken by the stone, cut out without hands." 9. Rome was the only, power which could be referred to, for it was the only '^XCKSBINB GREAT' power which succeeded the four kingdoms, and fulfilled all parts of the description. Finally. As Medo-Persia and Grecia sue- ceed each other in this vision, just as they had been seen twice before, it is absurd to suppose that the power which follows them in this vision is a different power fraiu the one which twice before had been seen succeeding-them. THE TWO RESURRECTIONS. The Congregational Journal, the organ of that denom- ination in New Hampshire, contains a sermon or essay, in opposition to our views, " Written in compliance with an appointment of the Deerfield Association, and read before the same at their meeting at Deerfield, Nov. 8, 1842, by Rev. NATHANIEL WELLS :—Published in the Journal at the request of the Association " It is not calculated to shake the railh of those who undetstand the subject, but it may excite prejudice in those who do not. The chief argument is founded on the belief that there is to be but one resurrection. The readerwill take no- tice that they derive this belief from prophecy, which they profess, on this point, to understand. Here, then, is an important principle, assumed at. the outset : viz. Un- fulfilled Prophecy may be understood. The article which we shall consider as the production of an association, and not of an individual, commences thus : " Vain would be the attempt to follow Mr. Miller through all his hypotheses, assumptions, and strange combinations of.very important truths with his own groundless conjectures." On the subject of the two resurrections they proceed to quote from Mr. Miller's lecture on Rev. 20 : 6. They do not name the text, however: " Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the FIRST RESURRECTION, on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years." If there is a FIRST resurrection, there must be another, and of course, the doctrine of two resurrections is clearly proved by this one text, unless it can be ex- plained away. Instead of attempting this difficult task, they quote three other passages from which they infer there is to be but one resurrection, but not one of which proves it. They therefore leave us the easy task of balancing between the authority of God's express declar- ations on the one hand, and their inferences on the other. We will therefore leave them for the present, and consult God's word, with this question in our minds : Do other parts of the Bible teach that the righteous and the wicked will be raised at different times 1 We beg our readers to let GOD answer this question, and not intrude their own answers before reverently listening to His. See 1 Thessalonians, 4: 14, "For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, so them also that SLEEP IN JESUS will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive, and remain unto the coming of our Lord, shall not pre- vent [go before] them that arc asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and the trump of God, and the DEAD IN CHRIST shall rise FIRST." Here, then, is the same first resurrection mentioned^ Revelations, for it is impossible there can be two essen- tially different resurrections, and each of them be proper- ly called the FIRST. The Apostle proceeds, (verse 17,) "Then we which are alive and remain, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air, so shall we ever be ivith the Lord." It is not said we shall ever be in the air, but ever be with the Lord ; and John, in the 21st of Revelations, which was originally connected with the 20th, tells us where we shall be- -in the new Jerusa- lem, "the Tabernacle of God with men, and he will dwell with them." Let us now turn to the 15th chap of 1 Cor., where the resurrection is largely dwelt upon, and see if the same truth is there taught us. The apostle says we are to be raised ; " every man in his own order ; Christ the first fruits, afterwards, THEY THAT ARE CHRIST'S AT HIS COMING. Then cometh THE END." Of course, the righteous dead are-raised AT Christ's coming, and the rest of the dead '< live not again" till after " the END," whatever it may mean, which comes "THEN." Paul does not tell us how long after the first resurrection the second will come, but John says it will be a thousand years. Both spake by the same Spirit. Their words harmonize without the least violence. Shall we add to the words of Paul and explain away those of John, because they do not aecjrd with our notions ? Paiii must be speaking of a literal resurrection in which the righteous only have a part. In the progress of his dis- course we learn that it introduces the subjects of it into a kingdom which flesh and blood cannot inherit, (verse 50,) and it shall be " in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the LAST TRUMP, for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed." (verse 51.) What will this change be? Refer to Phil. 3 : 20, 21— " For our conversation, [i.e. our citizenship, as the most eminent divines render it,] is in heaven, from whence also we LOOK for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto him- self." Our opponents cannot reconcile this language with their notion that the first resurrection is only a revi- val, introducing their expected millennium. They can- not call it the first revival, for there have been many re- vivals from the days of Christ till now, and the millen- nium has not yet come. But these passages are all con- sistent with our belief in two resurrections. The apostle tells us the dead in Christ shall rise, and it shall be their blessedness to be ever with the Lord. John says, they shall reign with Christ, and adds, " Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection." It appears, then, that the first resurrection is a rising to salvation. Now, the apostle to the Hebrews, says: (9: 28,) " Christ was Once offered to bear the sins of many, and unto them that LOOK for him shall he appear the second time, without sin, unto salvation." These passages, like an unbroken chain, bind together the first resurreciion, and Christ's second "coming, showing them to be at the same time, and for the same purpose—the glorification of his followers. We will turn to a few other Scriptures, which would be obscure and difficult on any other interpretation. In the third chapter of Philippians, Paul declares that " we [Gentile believers] are the circumcision which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice IN CHRIST JESUS, and have no confidence in the flesh."—[i. e. in descent ] Pie then goes on to say, that though he was of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews, as touching the law of Pharisee, yet he considered these things all worthless ; yea, he says, " I count all things but loss for the excellency of tbe knowledge of Christ Jesus, for whom 1 have suffered the loss of all things, if by any means I MIGHT ATTAIN unto the resurrection of the dead." Examine the whole passage, from the first verse to the eleventh, and then tell us what Paul means by at- taining to the resurrection of the dead, if all mankind have part in the same resurrection as a matter of course.— But, it may be asked, whyxlid not Paul name the first resurrection ? Those who are skilled in Greek give us a ready answer to this question, an(J by so doing furnish us with an overwhelming argument for the two resurrec- tions. The expression in the original implies that Paul was seeking for a peculiar resurrection OUT FROM AMONG the dead. He considered it of infinite impor- tance that he should have part in the first resurrection, and not be among those who would be left behind to suffer the second death. Again, in the 11th of Hebrews, a host of worthies are mentioned who stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, &c., "and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance, that they might obtain a better re surrection." This language certainly implies that'there is one resurrection inconceivably better than the other. * Turn also to Luke 14: 13, 14, where our Saviour says : "When thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind ; and thou shalt be blessed ; for they cannot recompense thee, but thou shalt be recompensed at the RESURRECTION OF THE JUST." Here it is evident that THE JUST are to have a resurrection peculiar to themselves; otherwise Christ might have said, at the general resurrection, but it is remarkable that no such expression ever occurs in the Bible. Paul says, he believes there will be a resurrection, BOTH of the just, AND of the unjust, (Acts 24: 15,) and this is among the "things which are written in the law and in the prophets." Christ had mentioned the " resur- rection of the just." Paul here adds that he believes in the resurreciion of the unjust, also. Why is this dis- criminating phraseology always used, if there is not a discrimination between the resurrections of the just and of the unjust ? But Christ himself expresses this dis- crimination still more strongly, when he says : " All that are in the graves shall hear his voice ; and shall come forth, they that have done good, UNTO THE RESURRECTION OF LIFE, and they that have done evil, unto the resurrec- tion of damnation." John 5 : 28, 29. Would our read- ers imagine that this is one of the three texts quoted to shoiv the falsity of the doctrine of two resurrections ! Yet so it is. The only color of support they can derive from this text is, from Christ's saying that " the hour is com- ing" when these resurrections shall occur. From this expression they infer that the resurrections cannot be a thousand years apart. To this we might merely reply, that if the Bible elsewhere declares the resurrections shall be 1000 years apart, it must be true, and Christ's language cannot contradict any truth, for then his words would be false, which is impossible. Let us see then how Christ uses the word hour, only three verses above the one quoted. " The hour is coming and now is, when the dead shall hear the Voice of the Son of God, and they that hear shall live." Our clerical opponents, would all agree, that the dead here spoken of are the dead in sins. The hour in which they are converted had then commenced, and will continue till the door of mercy is closed, which, according to their belief, will be a thousand years besides the 1800 already passed away.— Surely, if an hour extends so far in one verse, it may ex- tend 1000 years in another, and the use of the word does not prove that the two resurrections here spoken of are not the same as the resurrection of the " blessed and holy" of " the rest of the dead," mentioned in the 20th of Revelations. The fact that Christ uses the word re- surrection twice in one sentence, and designates the two by such opposite characteristics, is an argument not easily disposed of in any other view. They also quote the text in Daniel (12: 2,) which says : " Many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." They certainly give great weight to the prophecies of Daniel, when they undertake to prove that a doctrine taught in the New Testament cannot be true, if Daniel records the language of an angel on the subject, in which it is not also taught. They cer- tainly will not contend.that Gabriel contradicts the doc- trine of two separate resurrections, though it was no part of his business to teac-h any thing more than that some would rise to everlasting life, and some to shame and ever- lasting contempt. When it is prophesied that Christ shall come to " proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord and the day of vengeance of our God," both phrases might seem to mean one period, but there is nothing in the prophecy to show that the acceptable year might not commence at his first coming, and the day of VENGEANCE be deferred to the second, when he shall be " revealed from heaven in flaming fire, taking VENGEANCE." Thus we understand the prophecy in Isaiah by the light of the New Testament: may we not be guided by the same light in understanding the words of Gabriel to Daniel, and thus see that the " blessed and holy" rise to ever- lasting life one thousand years before the "rest of the dead !" "rise to shame and everlasting contempt." It will be seen that these clergymen find the resur- rection revealed in the book of Daniel. They had not been taught the new theology of Prof. Stuart and others, who deny that this text has any reference to the final resurrection, or'that any text in Daniel refers to the end of the world. # But the main argument against the two resurrections is thus stated— "Once more. According to our Savior's representa- tion of the day of judgment, in the 25th chapter of Mat- thew, both the righteous and the wicked of all nations shall stand before him at the same time ; and a final sepa- ration shall at that time be made, the righteous being placed on his right hand, and the wicked on his left. To the former he will say, 'Come, ye blessed of my Father, in- herit the kingdom prepared for yon from the foundation of the world.' To the latter he will say, ' Depart, ye cursed, into everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels.' And in the closing scene it is said, that ' these latter shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the right- eous into life eternal.' But it cannot be necessary to re- peat again what a different representation Mr. Miller's doctrine gives of this tremendous scene." Here, again, these ministers should have understood the fashionable theology which is brought up against us ; viz., that all this was fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusa- lem. They admit the important truth that it relates to the judgment. Can any one believe that all tbe scenes ofthe judgment will be finished in a day of twenty-four hours 1 Of course not. A single scene is therefore introduced to show the object and nature of that judgment. Matthew Henry says, on this discourse : "Some passages in it are parabolical, as the separating between the sheep and the goats, and the dialogue between the Judge and the persons judged." Here it seems as if the wicked would speak to defend themselves, but from another parable we learn that they are " speechless." In the parable, (Luke 16) the rich man in hell is represented as being within speaking dis- tance of Abraham, whom he "SAW," but this, according to Scott, does not " determine whether condemned spirits actually know or see what takes place in the realms of bliss." It is an admitted principle among theologians, (see Home's Introduction,) that the plain language of Scripture is to be the standard with which parables are to be compared, and no doctrine can be established merely from an expression in a parable. But this discourse of our Lord cannot prove any thing on the subject of the resurrection, till it is first proved that it relates to the resurrection. The learned Dr. Ma- ther says : "Theprocess of judgment on the sheep and goats, in the 24th chapter of Matthew, has not one of the raised from the dead concerned in it, but is a quick division and decision made by our Lord among the Christians who cry for mercy, when they see the fire of God ready to seize upon them, determining who shall be caught up to meet the Lord, and who shall be left to the perdition of ungodly men, in the flames before them." Now, when theologians can raise such opposite doctrines from this language, and it certainly is not declared that any are raised from the dead to take part in the scene, we should certainly be careful not to make our infeienccs on this passage the standard by which to cut down the plain lan- guage of other Scriptures. The transactions of the judgment cannot be supposed to be all described in a few short verses, but all the de- scriptions of it must harmonize together. In Rev. 20: 13, we have this scene introduced—"And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God : and the books were opened ; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works." We might at first imagine that this was a com- prehensive sketch, reaching from the beginning to the end ofthe judgment. But after this, we have the follow- ing scene described;—how long it occurs after the other', we must learn elsewhere. " And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and hell, [or, the grave, as in the margin,] delivered up the dead which were in them, and THEY were judged every man according to THEIR WORKS. . . . And whoever was not found written in the book of life, was cast into the lake of fire." Observe the difference between these descriptions. In the first, we have the dead, BJULL and gieat," which includes infants, for "of such is the kingdom of God." In the second, they are not mentioned. In the first, the book of life is said to be opened, but not in the second ; nor is it said that any in the second scene meet any other doom than to be " cast into the lake of fire." The second scene, we may therefore conclude, is connected with the second resurrection, which is the " resurrection of dam- nation." In John 6: 40, the promise to those who believe in Christ is this : " I will raise him up at the last day." Why was this special promise to those who believe in Christ, if all are to be raised up together 1 Look, also, at the conversation between Christ and the Sadducees, (Luke 20: 34, 35.) " They^who shall be ac- counted worthy to attain that world, and THE RESURREC- TION FROM THE DEAD, neither marry nor are given in mar- riage," &c. Here the original conveys the idea of a rising in which some are accounted worthy to be raised out from among others who are left behind. But what meaning can there be to this expression, in view of any doctrine, which denies the two* resurrections 1 Other passages might be referred to whieh clearly im- ply two resurrections, but till some Scriptural proof is brought in opposition, it is not necessary to do more than to state this jingle proposition—No DOCTRINE CAN AGREE WITH ALL THE TEXTS ON THIS SUBJECT, BUT THE DOCTRINE OF TWO RESURRECTIONS : consequently, no other doctrine can be true, for that DOES AGREE with every text. This, then, is the conclusion to whieh the Scripture so clearly guides us, viz : When Christ comes the second time, which will be personally, in the clouds of heaven, all living believers in him will be caught up to meet him, together with all who have slept in Jesus, when all re- jecters of Christ will be burned, and the rest ofthe dead will live not again, till a thousand years are finished, when they will rise to be adjudged worthy of the second death ! Reader, does this thought terrify you 1 Then fly to Jesus, who is now inviting you to flee from the wrath which is to come. Judge yourself now, that ye be not adjudged to the second death. For the Midnight Cry. MILLERISM REFUTED, &c. It will probably be recollected by most of our readers, that in No. 20, ofthe Daily Midnight Cry, we published a long article under the above heading, written against our v&ws, by a theologian of New Haven, Ct., signing him- self "B.," in connection with a reply. A " review" of our reply, has just come to hand, which perhaps should have a passing notice. We associated this "B." with one, of which we had occasion to say something in No. 16, under the head of " Wrath and Bitterness," but we are happy to learn by the article now before us, that this is quite another " B.,7 and we are not at all surprised that he is anxious to have the fact known. As it regards the " Review" before us, we can find but little that bears the semblance of argument, or deserves a reply. The writer takes exceptions to our remarks on Ps. ii: 8. He makes a quotation from Mr. Scott's opin- ion, which, by the way, is as much, or rather more, in favor ofthe view we gave of it, than it is in favor ofthe view he advocates. The following is a specimen of the harmony, or rather confusion of our friend " B's" arti- cle. He says, " They, (the heathen) are not given to him (Chr'st) not in orderthat he may dash them to pieces, but in order that he may govern them by his rule," &c. He then adds, " It is nevertheless true, that all who do not embrace the religion of Christ, will he broken with a rod of iron, and dashed in pieces like a potter's vessel." Now, this is conceding to us all we claim—our entire ar- gument. All that are convened to Christ of course cease-to be heathen. Now let the reader look at Ps. ii : 8, 9, and he will no doubt be fully satisfied ofthe correct- ness of our position on this point. We will here introduce one more specimen of our author's argument, the imbecility of which, we do not attribute at all to a lack of ability, but the ulter unten- ableness ofthe cause he advocates. Speaking of our "copious argument" proving that the 8th and 9th chapters of Daniel refer to the same sub- ject, he says, "This I do not deny. But granting it," he adds, " it will not prove that the two periods, (i. e. the 70 weeks, and the 2300 days) commence at the same time." Now this is a naked assertion, without even an attempt at argument. When we say, that if the 8th and 9th chapters refer to the same subject, it does clearly prove the identity of the starting point of the two num- bers, our say so is just-as good as his. And our premi- ses admitted, I believe every candid logician would not deny that it is a conclusive argument. But now for a little argument. I ask what sense would there be in Daniel 9 : 24, if it did not refer to the vision of the 8th chapter, of the 2300 days 1 The Angel says, 9 : 22, 23, 24, " O Daniel, I am now come to give thee skill and understanding. Therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision. Seventy weeks are determined (cut off) upon thy people." &c. First Gabriel came to make him understand the vision, of the 8th chapter, of course, for there is no vision in the 9th chapter. And all of the 8th chapter had been explained, but the 2300 days. Se- cond, if 70 weeks were cut off, they must be cut off from some greater number, and the 2300 days is the on'y num- ber given. Mr. " B." has conceded us so much of our premises, that his argument is like throwing dust against the wind—it returns to his own eyes. Speaking of our date for setting up the little horn, which we make A. D. 538, he says, " There are many other periods which have more probability for the dates, &c." But there is one argument which we have never seen assailed for fixing the date of the setting up of the little horn, or Papacy, at 538. The ten horns represent the ten divisions of the Roman Empire, which were es- tablished between the years 356 and 4S3. The little horn came up among these ten, three of which fell before it. Now if they were rooted up by the little horn, the latter must have eome up just about the time the third one fell, which was A. D. 538. Now is it probable that the little horn which uprooted the three, the last of which fell in 538, did not itself come up till 606 1 Mr. Croly says, " The annalists of Rome, spurn the idea that Phocas was the founder of the Supremacy of Rome. They ascend to Justinian as the only legitimate source, &c." It is unnecessary here, to repeat the law of Justinian, with the dates, &e., they having been so often presented to our readers. We are not obliged' to come down to 1798 and count back to find the point, but we find it in history in 538, and then in 1798 we find au event corres- ponding to the great subject, and we find it so perfect, that it will work both ways : we can count to it, or from it. The following paragraph indicates a candor which we hope will lead to a discovery and acknowledging of the truth : " In conclusion, we unite with the writer in saying, ' look well to the subject.' It will do you no harm to ex- amine Mr. Miller's theory; but examine it with prayer, and with a careful study of the Bible ; and- do not em- brace it without a careful examination. Many have ridi- culed Mr. Miller? and called him an ignorant fanatic. This we entirely disapprove. We believe there are few individuals in this country who have as good a knowledge of Scripture and those parts of history relating to pro- phecy, as Mr. Miller." For ourself, we say, if we err, let it be in looking for the coming Lord too soon. But we entertain no fears that God will not fully justify his word, and take care of his despised and taunted people, who are willing to for- sake every thing for Christ. O sinner, get ready, for the coming ofthe Lord drawet'n nigh. L. D. F. THE LUNAR PHENOMENON, The beautiful Lunar Phenomenon which was seen at Newark on the evening of the 15th inst. was gazed upon by hundreds with thrilling admiration. It was first ob- served between eight and nine o'clock in the evening, the moon being about at its zenith. It was surrounded by three concentric circles, beautifully marked with all I the varied colors of the rainbow, of the most brilliant } hue, the centre space within the circumference of the \ lunar circle, being of beautiful silvery whiteness. The opposers of the speedy coming of Christ seem to have been somewhat agitated by this phenomenon, and anticipated an application of it for us. A clergyman at Newark, on seeing it, said, " I sup- pose the Milleritcs will see something of Miller in it."— Probably he " supposed" we were not philosophers enough to see GOD in it !! x An elderly lady, who despises " Millerism," on seeing it, made the following, beautiful prophetic observation— •'The Lord has promised that he will not drown the world with water any more, and he has set the rainbow in the clouds for a sign. But now he has closed the bow, and is going to burn the world with fire." SCOFFERS.—Who are they 1 Those who shall arise in the last time and say where is the promise of his Coming.— It would seem as if the glorious doctrine of Christ's per- sonal coming to reign on the earth were to be revived in the church a short time before the reality should take place.— Witnesses for this truth would arise who would proclaim it throughout the length and breadth of Christendom. But as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be again. Ridicule, and jest, and witticism will attack what reason cannot over- throw. These are the weapons which those will use who "love not his appearing." The wicked servant who says, " My Lord delayeth his coming," and the scoffer who cries, "Where is the promise of it," can neither of them pray with sincerity. " Thy kingdom come," for that in which alone the answer to their prayer consists they revile, viz : His coming to take to himself his great power and to reign. —Millcnarian. SECOND ADVENT.—We understand that the French Catholics in Canada, are adopting to a very considereble cxtext, the views of Mr. Miller—also the Protestant Methodists and Freewill Baptists, both clergy and laity, are said very generally to believe and teach the same doctrines.—W. 11. Cabinet. LETTER FROM MICHIGAN. A brother in Brooklyn has sent the Midnight Cry to his son-in-law in Michigan, from whom he has received a letter, portions of which we are permitted to publish : " I send you my sincerest thanks for the key you have sent us, with which we have unlocked the heretofore hidden mysteries of revelation : I mean the Midnight Cry. I doubt not, however, but you will be repaid lor your trouble, by learning that after a careful examination of the subject, my wife and myself have both embraced the doctrine of the second advent of our blessed Saviour this year, and so great is the call for information on the subject here, that we did not get time lo read all the pa- pers before our neighbors carried them off Some of them have been to Northville, four miles and a half from here Elder Wisner, a Baptist preacher in that place, read an extract from one of them to his congregation. It is said to have been listened to with great solemnity. 1 presume if a copy of the Cry was sent to Rev. Mr. Wis- ner, Northville, Wayne County, it would be the means of doing much good. I do not know as Elder Wisner is a believer in the second advent at hand, but I understand from Deacon Flint, who is a member o: his church, that he has spoken well of the paper. The clergy in the back woods are not corrupted by popularity so much as I pre- sume many in the cities are. 1 hope Dr. Brownlee will not in future ridicule Mr. Hatfield's Antiochus doctrine, for of all things I detest civil wars. It is bad enough for people to 'kill their enemies, but when they fight their friends it is horrible. The first question to be considered, it appears to me, is, does a prophetic day mean a year ? If so, then, does the 70 weeks of Daniel 9th commence at. the same time with the 2300 days of Daniel 8th? Then, if the 7!> weeks end at the crucifixion, and who can doubt it, and the 230D days end at the second corning of Christ, we have but to go back from the crucifixion, 490 years, to find a starting point, which will bring us to 1S43, without the help of Antiochus or Rome either. Could a nation succeed us as we have the Jews, they would look back on the blindness and obstinacy of unbe- lievers of the present day with as much astonishment as we look on the conduct of the Jews, who would not be- lieve when they saw the dead corns forth from the grave at the command of our Saviour. " As for myself, you are aware that I have long been a believer in universal salvation, as I was well aware there was much ot the Scriptures the most learned did not pre- tend to understand, so it was an easy matter to set down all such passages as prove future punishment to the ac- count of 'sealed visions,' or inexplicable Scripture;—but when I came to see the vision unsealed, and to realize that ' all Scripture is given by inspiration, and is profita- ble,' &c., (2d Tim. 3 : 16.) I was obliged to give up the doctrine ; and I now look for the second coming of the Judge of the whole world with joy and hope. 1 rejoice that there is a prospect th it an end will be put to sin and oppression, and that ' man's inhumanity to man' will no longer make 'countless thousands mourn.' Indeed, it. seems to me that it is impossible for this J2arfh to remain much longer without some more terrible revolution than has ever yet agitated it. The corruptions of public offi- cers, the pride, arrogance and oppression of wealth, par- ticularly in England, where the poor are starving and the rich rioting, are becoming insupportable. But those who are so unspeakably happy as to have en the wedding gar- ment when the ' Bridegroom cometh,' hive reason to re- joice in the hope of soon being beyond tlje reach of afflic- tions, where they will sing the new song for ever and ever. In view of this glorious state-of things, what are riches, fame, and worldly honor.ss which have so long en- gaged my attention ? They aw at best but empty bubbles, which afford no real pleasure. "The Aurora borealis, spoken of in the Midnight Cry. and which was seen in London, was also seen here I saw the said Aurora on Tuesday evening, the 3rd of September, 1833. It was truly a grand spectacle, but it conveyed to my mind the idea of beauty and sublimity, rather than fear " . The writer proceeds to mention aluminous sickle, ap parently among the stars, which was distinctly seen by himself and brother-in-law, in 1838 ; also another singu- lar appearance in the Spring of 1841. "This was a bright bow, of a reddish cast, which spanned the heavens from west to east; the ends being dim, were curved to wards the north. It was seen at the same time at Ken- yon College, in Ohio." The Lord has told us he would send us signs, and though multitudes have been already recordeu, so that all are without excuse who slight them, yet we do not feel at liberty to decline publishing additional well au- th entioated facts of this kind, however much we may be sc ofFed at for so doing. A DREAM. A few weeks ago, the editor of the Midnight Cry'heard of the fact that a girl in Brooklyn, aged about twelve years, had an interesting dream. It conveyed an im- pressive lesson to her, and we publish it that others may heed the instruction it gives. In November last, I had a singular dream 1 thought some person sent a message to us to prepare to go to a certain city which ha 1 lately been discovered. We were told we must have our clothes all washed clean, or else we could not enter. We sent after a certain woman, who had often helped us, to come and wash our clothes. She said she could not wash them clean—and besides, she was going herself, and must wash her own. Then we sent out for another person, who came, but she could not do all the washing alone. Then mother and myself took hold and helped. The washing was finished, and the morning came, on which we were to start. It was a fine morning. The sun shone bright. We started about 10 o'clock. We first went over to New York. We went up a little way from the wharf, anrl came to a large block of buildings. It had many magnificent houses. We walked around it several times, and kept looking up and talking. Present- ly the sun was darkened, and we found it was caused by a cloud of smoke that rose from the buildings. W§ im- mediately started for the river, and in a few minutes a boat came up. It was long enough to reach across the river. It had a white awning over it, but had neither sails, engine, or wheels. As the boat came up, we went on without be ng told ! As the people ranged themselves under the awning, each one placed himself in front of an anchor, of which there were just as many as there were passengers. Some were large and some were small, but they were all very bright and shining. A man soon came with two rolls. He was a pleasant- looking man,, dressed in white, and had siLvery hair. When he came on the boat, he opened the paper roll and read it. He then told them all to sit down and get their strings ready to give him. He then gave me the other roll, and told me to wind the strings they should give him, on that. A woman came on with two dogs, and staid outside the awning. The man clothed in white told her to go in and sit down with the rest. She refused, but she s«t down by the door until the fire came close to her. Then she got up and wont .in the middle of the boat. The man then went around and got the strings, each family by themselves, and tied them in a singular knot, and gave them to me to wind. When he came to that woman, he asked her for her string She said she had none. He then told her that she must go off. She started, but her dogs did not follow. She soon came back and cried for her dogs. He got them for her, and then she went out and sat down on the dirty dock, with her dogs each side of her. The pleasant man, with the silvery hair, con- tinued to collect the strings. I saw Mr. Miller in the crowd, who looked very happy as he held out his string, and said, " Take it—here it 13." His string was very long, and the man tied a singular knot in it. Ho then came to a young man who was standing out- side of the awning, and said to him, " Friend, why do you stand here ? Why don't you go in and sit with the rest? Have you got a string '." The young man answered, " No." "Then you must go off," said the man in white. He went off, but turned and looked back wishfully, and then walked on. After he had collected all the rest of the strings, the man asked me for mine. I told him that I left it on the dock. The thought then struck me that it bad fallen in the water. He asked me how far it was. I said it was not very far. He told me to make haste, for the boat might start, so that I could not get in after all I went after it, and found one end hanging towards the water. I picked it up and hurried back, for fear the boat should be gone It had not started. I gave him the string, and he tied it on with the rest. He then gave me the roll, and told me to keep it. Then turning round, he asked what time it was He was answered, " In half an hour the time will be up." When it was time, the boat started. As it glided from the dirty shore of the burning city, we could see the fire raging fast, and the people darting about, hitting each other ; when all at once a white sheet rolled down, and hid it from our view. We passed on smoothly, and in a few minutes we came to where we saw some beautiful flowers. One was of a light color, and it shone. It was surrounded by ma- ny others, which were not so large and bright. As we walked on, I saw little infants walking as if they had been grown people, with their strings in their hands. We all stood in little groups, talking, when my mother's younger sister came up alone, and began to converse with her. Presently, I heard beautiful singing. It sounded like the hymn I have often heard sung—" See the Judge de» scending." Then I awoke. Reader, you know not how soon your Lord may ceme, when you must perish with a burning world, if you are not ready to go with Him to the beloved city. Are you ready now ? OTTOMAN SUPREMACY GONE. The departure of the Ottoman, or Mahomedan supre- macy, it was long since believed by Mr. Miller, would mark the close of the sixth trumpet. Brother Litch's lecture on this subject was published in 1838, maintain- ing that the sixth trumpet would cease Aug. 11, 1840, if the prophetic period, Rev. 9 ; 15, was to be understood " a day for a year." The event fully justified the inter- pretation. The papers at the time headed their columns of eastern news, " The Ottoman Power Down"—" The Turkish Empire fallen." Now, that they see the appli- cation of the fact, many are denying that such an event ever took place. Mr. Bellamy, pastor of the Baptist Church worshipping in Stanton street, recently said, if the Turkish empire was down he had yet to learn it — He might have read in the N. Y. Observer, Aug. 1841, "The Turkish Empire is but a mere corpse." But the truth will often come out on a subject, when one has occasion to refer to it incidentally. The Baptist Advocate of Jan. 28th, says : " The Turkish government in Syria appears to give little satisfaction either to the inhabitants or to the Allied Powers who RESTORED IT." What occasion had they to restore a government, if it was not down? Again, the editor says ; " The inherent weakness of the Turkish Empire be- comes every day more apparent. England and Austria wish to sustain it as a bulwark against the encroach- ments of Russia. But a body that CANNOT STAND OF ITSELF, is a weak bulwark." THE LITTLE HORN PUSHING. " And the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them until the Ancient of days came." Dan. 7; 21, 22. Nothing is more clear, than that the spirit of the little horn is disseminated through the Protestant as well as the Romish church; and it will prevail against the saints till the personal coming of our blessed Lord. While the cry is heard in every direction, "WATCH- MAN, WHAT OF THE NIGHT !" with the deepest in- tensity, the watchmen, (too generally,) are saying, We know nothing about it. Hear the word of the Lord— Ezek. 33: 6, " If the watchman see the sword coming, aud blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned, and any be taken away in his iniquity, his blood will I require at the watchman's hand." See from the first to the twelfth verse. What a fearful responsibility rests with the watchmen on the walls of Zion. We fear that the watchmen feel more concern for their particular sect, than they do for the crowning hope of Israel, and the salvation of souls. The following article, which we find in last week's Christian Advocate and Journal, gives a painful illus- tration of the spirit of many of those who are placed as watchmen. It is from the pen of a Methodist clergyman of Newark, N. J. "The Millerites have organized a church (I) in this city. A few ^2) Methodists are involved in the fanati- cism, some of whom, silly doves, if doves at all, have condescended to receive the Sacrament from the hands GIFA Christian [Unitarian (3) ] minister. S. WINNER." 1. They have NOT organized a chureh, but a Second Advent Association, from among all denominations. 2. Not a few, but MAN v. 3. Will brother Winner tell us what he means by a Unitarian 1 Are such the best arguments our opponents have to offer against our views ? If so, we predict that many more " doves, if doves they are," will plume their wings, and claim the privilege of flying where they can feed upon the grains of eternal truth, uncaged and unscared ; j where they can study—believe—and talk about what ' they esteem as truth, unmolested. f NOTE -In March, 1842, an article appeared in the Christian Review, published at Boston, entitled " Remarks on the Book of Daniel,' extending through 46 p?ges of that Baptist Quarterly It was written by the learned Prof. Chase, of the Newton Theological Institution. A commendatory notice soon alter appeared in the Christian WatchmanToThis Bro Hersey, a plain mechanic, belonging to the same denomination with the learned Professor, prepared an immediate reply, which first appeared in the SOTS of the Times We re-publish it because it shows the absurdity of some of the arguments now advanced by Messrs Stuart, Dowl.ng, Bellamy, Cookson, Per- kiL Hatfield, and Xrs. The reader will perceive that the writer could not put forth his whole strength, as he was cramped both for want of room, and want of freedom given him to express his thoughts, in the Watchman, for which his article was prepared ] A BRIEF REVIEAV OF REV. IRAH CHASE'S "REMARKS ON THE BOOR OF DANIEL." MESSKS. HIMES AND LITCH :— These remarks were prepared for the Christian Watch- man ; but although Mr. Crowell admitted "C. P. R.'s" article extolling Dr. Chase's « Remarks " very highly, yet he was unwilling to publish mine, unless I would reduce them very much, and leave out many parts that he con- sidered objectionable. I could not consent to this, and so offer them to you for your consideration. In that paper of July 22d, over the initials "C. P. R.," the attention of its readers was called to ihe first article in the March No. of the Christian Review, enti- tled " Remarks on the Book of Daniel.'i With the re- commendation of its correspondent I immediately com- plied. I had before given it a hasty reading, but now sat down to the reperusal with earnest attention. But I did not get the satisfaction from it that "C. P. i?." ex- pressed in his first sentence. I fully agree with him in his second; in the main I agree with him in the third; but in the fourth I cannot, for I must say I think the "Remarks" are unworthy of the "talents and biblical learning of the highly respected theological professor;" and that " the candid reader will fail to perceive sound- ness of judgment, critical acumen, and devout reverence ^ for divine truth, which might be expected from a ripe scholar, and an able interpreter of the saCred Scrip- tures." To the fifth, I have no particular objection; none to the sixth, except the word " happily," in the last line ; none to the seventh ; fully do I agree with him in the eighth; but in the last one, I cannot. I do indeed " thank the reverend author for this excellent model ot courteous discussion," but I cannot agree that it is a "truly valuable contribution." Here, now, I take my leave of "C. P. R.,:' and with your indulgence I will proceed to state my objections to some of the sentiments in the " Remarks." And now, in the outset, I will sav/1 shall endeavor to be governed by the book of Daniel; for when we leave the inspired word, and wander through the mazes of pro- fane history, the opinions of the fathers, or even the more modern commentaries, there is great danger of imbibing their errors imperceptibly ; and then, turning back to the inspired word, look at it through a distorftd medium ; and so our wrong views are cherished and continued. But when we come up, with a praying heart, to the Standard of Truth, willing to see and believe all that that teaches, we are sure of gettiag the truth ; and after find- ing it, the praying heart is still needed, to enable us to adopt it, and to relinquish all our preconceived opinions, however long they may have been entertained, or ar- dently cherished. . In Daniel ii. 28, it reads, " But there is a God in hea- ven that revealeth secrets, and maketh known to the king what shall be in the LATTER days." I am afraid the'professor did not keep this in mind as much as he should, in coming to the conclusion that he has, that all that was shown to Daniel, (except the seventy weeks,) was finished up and concluded with Antiochus, who died 1(54 years B. C. As there is no dispute about the first and second em- pires, we will pass to the consideration of the third. Dan. ii. 39, says : " And another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth." Now turn to chapter viii. 21: " And the rough goat is the king of Grecia; and the great horn that is between bis eyes is the FIRST KING." Mark these last two words. Now look back to the 7th verse : " And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and he smote the ram, and brake his two horns; and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him ; and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand." 1 Now, if these quotations fail to prove that Grecia is the THIRD kingdom, and that Alexander is only the first king, I might as well stop here: but believing that it will convince every praying, candid mind, I will proceed. Chap. ii. 40: "And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as IRON ; forasmuch as IRON breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things; and as IRON that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise." Chap. vii. 7: "After this, 1 saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly : and it had great IRON teeth : it devoured, and break in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it: BY LEWIS HERSEY. and it had ten horns." Now, Mr. Editor, is it the ob- tuseness of my intellect, or what is it, that I am ntterly unable to perceive the least resemblance in the kingdom of Seleucus, Ptolemy, &c., to the above inspired descrip- tion of the fourth kingdom? Will the "reverend pro- fessor" show us wherein his fourth kingdom was strong as iron; wherein it was diverse from all that were before it ? Will he tell us when, and where, it broke in pieces, and bruised ? Nay, is it not certain—will the professor deny it ?—that from -the death of the "first king" it began to dwindle, and that " over the regions beyond the Euphrates, where Seleucus and his successors reigned only seventy years before there was a successful revolt, under Arsaces, which led to the establishment of the Parthian empire ;" and finally it became extinct, by the Romans gaining the battle of Actium, and Egypt became a Roman province about thirty years B. C. Will he show us wherein it was so "dreadful and ter- rible, and strong exceedingly" above all the kingdoms which were before it? But when we apply it to the Romans, it seems to me the inspired description is exact in every particular. Looking at the relative duration of his four kingdoms, we see a disparity worthy of notice. Babylon from Pul, 241 ; Persia, 207 ; Alexander, 8; his successors to Anti- ochus, 137. That Alexander's is not the third, and his successors' the fourth, may be further proved, by looking at the 23d verse of the 7th chapter: "Thus he said, the fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces." And now, in the sincerity of my soul, I would place myself at the feet of the "reverend professor," and ask, with the humblest desire after truth, how this de- scription of the fourth kingdom by Daniel's heavenly instructor, can apply, in any respect; to the kingdom of Alexander's successors? Leaving out ail other consid- erations, this one alone would prove fatal to his theory, viz., that his third conquered the whole earth, for his fourth : whereas the above words of inspiration show us that the fourth devoured and trod down the whole earth. How could his penetrating mind fail of seeing this ? Did Seleucus, Ptolemy, &c., ever do anything an- swering to this ? On the contrary, was not theirs in its zenith, at the very moment of its commencement? Will he point us to a single nation that was added toj the vast conquests of Alexander, by his successors? Nay; had not that new power, which had begun to nse in the west, commenced its inroads already? Will the professor deny, that Rome had conquered very many places, which had been under the Greeks, besides Spain. Carthage, Cisalpine Gaul, Liguria, fee., within one hun- dred years from the death of Alexander ? On page 10 he says: " It was no longer united, al- though its several parts had many characteristics in common ; it was divided among Greek commanders that had been trained in the ambitious and bloody school of the great conqueror. The earth trembled'and groaned under the collisions, the long continued and destructive wars which ensued." If his fourth empire was thus torn with internal wars, so as to make the earth groan and tremble, how, I would ask, could it be '.'strong exceed- ingly," as Daniel declares the fourth should be ? On the same page he says, " It was strong as iron, and yet it was divided, partly strong, and partly broken." And here I can hardly refrain from saying, that this looks a little like perverting the meaning. Does the professor need to be informed, that the clay comes not up into the " legs of iron ?" But here now comes the eastern and western division; 41st verse: "And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes part of potter's clay and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided." Again, I would ask, does the Spirit mean nothing ii. describing the fourth empire in the 7th, 19th, and 23d verses of the 7th chapter, where it has the word diverse in each verse ? On page 10 he says, " It was different from the other empires ; for it was not under the sway of one individual, or of one dynasty, but of several; and especially, at one time, of fo'ii, and at a later period of two." Can it be possible, th.s is all the Spirit meant to convey to our minds, by using this word, diverse, in each of these verses :—four, and at a later period, two dy- nasties, instead of one? I think not. But the mo- ment we turn our eyes to the Roman, we see this diversity in several respects j in its different forms of government, which varied at different times, from the pure democracy to the absolute imperial. Their lan- uage, also, was different: their mode of warfare, also, was different: so also were their weapons. The Roman broad-sword, which, in the hand of a skilful man, would take off a man's head, or lay open his breast, or sever his shoulder at one blow, was something new to the Greeks and Asiatics. In all these things the professor's four empires varied but little. Well now, if 1 have succeeded in proving that the fourth is the Roman, ihen all he says about the ten horns out of his fourth empire, falls to the ground, of course. But, before we take our eyes off this "exceed- ing dreadful" beast, we had better take a more minute survey of his ten horns. After our " learned professor" has labored, with a tact and ability worthy of a better cause, to prove that the Greek empire constituted the third and fourth, he finds himself in a dilemma, from which, with all his "critical acumen," he is unable to extricate himself. If I understand him right, he takes the gold head—the lion—for his first; the silver arms and breast—bear and ram—for his second; the belly and thighs of brass—the leopard, and great horn—for his third;2 the legs of iron—terrible beast, and he- o-0at— for his fourth. Here, now, he finds ten toes out of his fourth kingdom, in the first imagery; ten horns in the second; five horns in the third. The toes he does not notice. The ten horns, he thinks are ten suc- cessive kings, or aspirants to the dynasty of Seleucus, one of the horns of the goat. Where does he get his authority for selecting that horn, on which to place his ten kings ? Why not reckon up the kings, and aspirants too, for they must not be left out, of the four dynasties, if they together constituted the fourth empire! Why not, did I say? A very good reason, forsooth ; there would have been too many. But "exceedingly arbitrary" as this looks to me, it is not more wide of the mark, than his bringing up a succession of kings and aspirants, during a long course of years, as the fulfilment of the ten horns, that Daniel beheld, firmly rooted contempora- ries in the head of his fourth beast. It looks little less than outrageous, to me, to see Pto- lemy Philometer, who aspired to the throne, and Deme- trius, the young and only son, who was now far away, even a hostage at the metropolis of the real fourth king- dom, (really this looks as if Rome had considerable power already, over the "exceeding strong" fourth kingdom of our professor!) and Heliodorus, the royal treasurer, placed up in the head of the beast as firmly rooted kings! tor it must not be lost sight of, that the little horn plucked up three standing ones, that had roots. But as " these great beasts, which are four, are four kings which shall arise out of the earth,"4 and " the ram which thou sawest, having two horns, are the kftigs of Media and Persia," and " the rough goat is the king of Grecia," in these three passages kings are certainly put for kingdoms. And another: " when he was strong, the „reat horn was broken, and for it came up four notable ones, towards the four winds of heaven." The profes- sor will be the last person to deny that these four horns mean kingdoms, after having himself placed eleven kings upon one of them. Besides, the 22d verse says, four kingdoms shall stand up." So now, as "the ten horns out of this kingdom, are ten kings that shall arise,'' t must believe they mean ten kingdoms also; which may be further argued, by referring back to our first quotation, Dan. ii. 28, where he informs the king that God had made known to him what should be in the LATTER days. With this in view, I see not how to avoid the conclusion, that the ten toes of the colossus are ten kingdoms ; which, with the modifications indi- cated in the change among the ten horns, are to con- tinue, until the stone strikes the image and breaks it to pieces; or, as it is expressed in the second imagery, the beast was ain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame; which is not yet done, and 1 think never can be until "the transgressors are destroyed together," (Ps. xxxvii. 38,) and "the slam of the Lord shall be at that day from one end of the earth, even unto the other end of the earth;" (Jer. xxv. M;) and " all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly—shal be burnea up-" Mai. iv. 1. And if the toes are kingdoms, then must the horns be also, for they indicate one and the same thing. After looking at the beast and his ten horns so long, we are prepared to look more particularly at the little horn, that had a mouth and eyes^ Now, a« we think, we have proved that the fourth is the Roman,! and the horns are kingdoms; and as it was strong as] iron until the dismemberment, then it follows, of course, that the little horn cannot be Antiochus, for he was dead at least 500 years before the ten had come up in the head of the beast. Besides, "the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them, until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the Most High ; and the time came that the saints possessed the KINGDOM." Dan. vii. 21, 22. When the professor quoted the above passage, on his 13th page, and omitted the' last clause, I inquired of my- self, what is the reason ? Is he afraid we should not see a fulfilment, in what took'place in the Jewish nation, at the death of Antiochus? Now, as "Ancient of days" and " Most High " must mean God ; and as he has no yet come, and given the KINGDOM to his saints; then it follows incontrovertibly, that the little horn cannot be Antiochus ; and equally certain does it follow, that it must be Papacy ; which had eyes to see, and a mouth to speak, unlike all his predecessors : whereas, Antiochus differed not, in anything essential, from tho.se that pre- ceded him. THE "TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DAYS." As we have found our brother in some sad mistakes about " another third kingdom of brass, which should bear rule over all the earth," and " the fourth kingdom! that should be strong as iron," and also "a,bout the ten horns out of this kingdom, and another that shall rise after them ;" so, I have some fears about taking him for a " pilot" to navigate my little craft through the "dan- gerous waters, and amidst the concealed rocks and shoals," ofthe "deeply interesting" 2300 days. " In the first year of Belshazzar, king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream and vision of his'head upon his bed." vii. 1. So, then, he was abed and asleep. "In the third year of Belshazzar, a vision appeared unto me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me at the first. And-I saw in a vision : (and it came to pass when I saw, that I was at Shushan, in the palace, which is in the province of Elam,) and I saw in a vision, and I was by the river Ulai." yiii.-l. It is as certain that this was in the day-time, as it is that the first was in the night. Now read 26th verse : " And the vision of the evening and the morning which was told is true : where- fore shut thou up the vision, for it shall be for many days." From these three quotations, we gather the fol- lowing facts, viz., that Daniel had a vision in the eve- ning ; in-three years after, he had another m the morn ing; and that they are one, by the Word being in the singular number in the last verse; and that.it is true; that it was to be shut up; and to be for many days. [Query. Is it likely Gabriel would call.three and a half years many days ?] , Whose voice but God's could it have been, from 'be- tween the banks of Ulai, directing Gabriel to make Dan- iel understand the vision ? " Understand, O son of man; for at the time of the end shall be the vision. Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the END shall be." Solemn occasion! Jehovah commands Gabriel, and he instructs Daniel. Momentous truths and stupen- dous events must be about to be made known, to have convened such an assembly. Well, what are they ? Why, that a wicked king should rise up, and trouble the Jews three and a half years, and then die ; and " blessed is he that waiteth and cometh" to hear of the death of Antiochus! Can "a ripe scholar," that is a Christian, believe this is all that is meant? Will the professor in- form us in <£hat sense the death of Antiochus was the time of the end?—how, and why, that could be called the last end of the indignation ? Will he inform us how| long it was before the Jews were overcome by the pa-| gan Romans ? If the death of Antiochus was the last end ofthe indignation to the Jews, then what is the meaning of Christ's words: "These be the days of vengeance, great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people; they shall fall by the edge ofthe sword, and be led away captive unto all nations?" And does not the present state of " this people " prove o- man then is the fourth kingdom. Scoffer's Corner. 1 How can any man of common understanding read this description of the he-goat's Coming on the wings of the wind, from the west, easting down, and stamping upon the ram, and then waxing very treat, without seeing the confusion which is introduced into the fair scriptural account of the four kingdoms, by adopting Mr. Chase's theory? Looking at this through his glasses, we see the fourth kingdom, flying from Europe, over the Hellespont, Asia Minor, and the Euphrates, charging upon and vanquishing the second kingdom ; (by the way, I had thought this fourth empire embraced the whole East, even as far as the Indus.) "We must not forget, it was the GOAT that came from the west, the GOAT that was moved with choler against the ram; the GOAT that brake the horns of the ram; it was the GOAT that cast him down, and stamped upon the ram ; and Pro- fessor Chase says the GOAT is the "fourth kingdom upon earth." I know it was the "first king" that directed his movements; but it was no less the goat on that account. While this was going on be- tween the second and fourth kingdoms, where. I would ask, was the " third kinedom of brass, which should bear rule over all the earth ? " —where ? Why. it was high and dry, standing up, a mere appendage to the fourth. But after the goat had become very great, ti;e great horn was broken, and four came up in its stead; bul it waa the GOAT still. 2 The dissimilarity in the symbols, setting forth the professor's third kingdom, must not be forgotten ; viz., belly and thighs of brass : four winged, four headed leopard, and one great horn. Where is the least resemblance in the two first with the last ? But put the two first with the goat himself, with his four horns, and all is harmony, BUttablesness mid proportion. APPENDIX. As the foregoing remarks were prepared for the Chris tian Watchman, and as I well knew both Mr. Crovvell and the publisher were hostile to the Second Coming of Christ in 1843, I Avas obliged, of course, to content my- self Avith merely overturning the professor's theory, Avith- out building up any other; but, meagre as Avas my article in this respect, it was inadmissible to their columns. While I have been considering Mr. Chase's "Remarks," and looking over Professor Stuart's