THE DAY Watsb therefore and be fiber. For Slow fake I would not bold my peace" London, Printed by T. w. for J. Crook ^^ are to be ibid at the fign of the Ship \n s.Paul * Chuxch-y aid, 1654, 0 F O R, IS RAEL'S RETURN THE LORD: THE PREFACE. ' ' ... '. '-»•'•'. - • * vt : H M tie fate which attended the Millenaries doBrine , been but as propitious as the Arguments -were reasonable, it had doubtle js been receivd with a more civil courtjhtp through every age, than thofe contemptuous [fittings andunhandfome fur gings at the mouth , which now for [0 many -jeers have entertain d it. To wife off all the foylfrom tho(e Spectacles through which it hathfo oft been mifreprefented,would no way fmt with the fir eight-lac d pre- einfts of a fheet or two, left I [pend more paper in Apologies than proofs. One thing, however , will deferve a peculiar reflection, to conjider that thisNow-dejetted Matron carried formerly fo well-fa- vour d an afpett,that the fir ft three Centuries {by her very Adver- faries acknowledgments) payd a conftant homage to her Reverence. Let the eminent DoCtor Feme ajfure us in the name of the reft (though a profeft enemy at the giving in this verdiSl ) in his pre- face again ft Champney. Of all that wrote (faith he ) for three hundred yeers, even down to Lattantius inclufively,moft of them avouch it, not one of them ( as he could finde) contradi&ing or writing againft it. I will not conceal, that through the wantonnefs of fome jenfual Cjofpellers {the G no flicks probably, that fcandalto the name of man) this beauteous flowr of Sfiritualtie was early di- ftorted into mif-fhapen apprehenfions , of mo ft hideous carnality, and warp't from its original puritte by the gr ofs conceptions of earthm headed Cerinthus, and fuck like bemir a Fle(h-pottsf whofe minds were wore dirty than the materials of their bodies : fo that I muft confefs the expectation according to their unclean fancies, was but fomewhat the more mode ft drefs of a MahumeticalParadife. t{or can I much wonder at the prejudice of my diffenting Brethren, while I remember in how unfetmely a portraiture they acre wont to behold it. Can any foul that dare lay claim to Chriftendom incou- 1 A 2 rage rilgjf the leaft conceit in his breaft of a Royaltie hlonghg to the Blejfed ]efas beneath a fenfe celeftia ? in a word , rl his jtdie in the Scripture-view is the firJt All of Heaven to reunited fpirits ; 7 he incomparable mirrour of mans Redemption ; 'I he itiyfterioui mar- riage of the All-glorious Lan-bto his thn lively Spoufe.ihe refiored few , and the completed Gentile ; lie Divine.untwifling of all the holy Prophets riddles {Ike KcwJ emblem in her robes of Innocence; Our Redeemers final tritmph over Sin,Death,andHell; and (with fobriety) Eden in her Sabbath-day-garments , where as man) as trre allowed the royal favour of that admirable Communion (for the reft are abandon d to the burning Lake) fhall converfe in their ori- ginal principles offpiritual integrity , after an inconceivable man* ner with beatified Saints and Angells - Briefly , ±An eft ate fpiri- tual, purely fublimd from finfuil and carnal feculencyes, and al- together heavenly , though on earth. I will forbear to ftretch the preface any wider , left the £ity run out at the gates , and only ad- vert if e the Header JJOW it hath been the Devi lis mafter-ftratageme, through all times, to accoutre this glory in Antick^difguifesjty the opportunity of which Legerdemain,as he cheated the Ancient Jews out of the true (fhrift, even while he was among them :fo he clean- ly conveyd in Antichrift upon the inadvertent Chriftians. Now venture on me Reader through thefe inducements , ( with the in- touragement of brevity into the bargain) and unlefs the premijfes be made firm before J part, throw me out too for Cerinthus his Antimasf^ CHAP. I. (i ) Chap. I. BemnjlrAting. thai the ft ate defer ib'd intheii, eft he Revel: is the fame with that portraied in Jtaiah 60. and other places of the Prophets, of Refioring the Jews, and full fiefs of the Ge»- tiles, to befullfilldm earth. is nothing hath proov'd more inja- m gp lious to this truth, than that l'ome have m raftily undertaken ro defcend too daringly fp|into its facred receffes, and ( by the li- berie of their own fancies ) to defcribe particulars about it unwarranted by Scripture. Thus -well-meaning M. Archer hath formerly heplum'd it with many unfuitable Ideas, rendring himlelf ridicu- lous, and the opinion queftionable; upon this ftock he drew on his head that Reverend, and moft Religious Combatant B'ftiop Hall, an Adverfary of fo approv'd abilities that his very appearance in the caule eaftly everted the rocking foundations of fo tottering a fa- brick. Itmuft needs be held for an infobriety icarcely excufable, not to reft contended with general fpeau lationsof Cuch a glory, which is no lefle than a ray of that tranfeendent brightness of which the * Apo-*» Cor. file hath advifed us that tis not poflible for the heart of man-to frame conceptions.My method therefore fhall be toprefent the ground-work of this excellency from the facred Bible, and neither adventure my feif, nor encourage others, to raife any private fuperftru&ures. Goe we on then in the Name of God/to make good the propofals of the Chapter. Tis evident our Tran- slators themielves referr the 1?, 24. and 25. yerlesof $ RfV. ;Rev. 21, to the IP. and IT. verfes of Jfaiah 60. And in thefe already inftane'd we meet with one pal- fage as unlikely to be fullfil'd on earth as any in the whole bible, viz,. The £ity had no need, of the Sun, &c. Which notwithftanding its parallel in Jfaiah, to him that weighs the Chapter prooves undeniably to be meant no where els. The 26. vy of Rjv. 2x.be- longs to the j.apd following verfes of Jfahh 60. And thelaft v. in Rev. to the one ana twentieth v. of chat in Jfaiah, Thy people fhall be all righteous, compar'd with Jfaiah ft. ii But let's take the Ch. in order. The firftw. of Rev. 21. is exa£V:y correfpondent with Jfaiah 6J, 17. which p ace in the Prophet, if any lufpc¬ to beaccomplifhton earth, let him take level by the 21. v. They [hall build houfest&c. with many other per- tinencies of the context. The 2. v. in the Rev. of the New Jerusalem prepared as a Bride adorned for her hiaband, anfwers Jfaiah 62. 2. Thou fhall be called [a] New Je~ fry a ]\jeyv name, which the mouth of the Lord fhall rufalem. name. Thou fhalt be a (frown of glory in the hand,of the lb New Ji- Lord, and a royall[b~\ diadem in the hand of thy God. f*Umadorned. And ^ an(j $ v^0(Jjaiah^1, Where Jefus is called [c] New Je. Beulah,i.earned,as the margent tells you,& @od ' «edT PfC* comPar,<1 t0 the Bridegroom. All which moft evident- Bride. * Iy concerns that condition of Jerusalem when the Gentiles fhall come into her light, as appears by the 2. v. there, And the Gentiles fhall fee thy righteovf- [rfj Our own [d] Srgo to be effe&ed on earth. See the like Tranflarori evidence in Jfaiah 54. J. For thy maker is thine hus- ^efume'thefc Stated °D the lame time v' feed parages of The in^erit (jentiles. Compare the third v. in Rev. ,21» prophets to be with Eackjel 37, 27. The tabernacle of God is with meant on men, and frail dwell with them. For the Wurd [ He ] den? by'thl* not the;Greek, which is therefore, odly thruftin (contents they prefix. Vii: ffgiek 74. and Jftiah #x.But Jfthey point at the Jews calling, as I fear not to make thee confcflc before I dole, then will. { fure) none imagine any otber fc«i« than the earth, H %foMr Trail (la tors, purpcfely to referr the fcnT^rf [ dwelling ] to [ god J and not to [ TabermcU whereas both in the genuine meaning, as alio in the Greek it plainly belongs to [ Tabernacle; ] i'o in E- My 7 abernacle alfo fhall It with them, yea I will be their God, and theyjhali.be my people, direaly as in the Rev. The Tabernacle of God is with men, They fhall be hu people, and God will be their God. Now it muft needs be granted,that in that place treates of the foremention'd glory of Jfraels reftauration to be perform d on earth. Examine the whole Chapter dear Reader, and ufe thine own judgment, for thou muft be try'd by it: And that by the Tabernacle of God in this inftance is meant Chrift in his humane na- ture, I am haJf perlwaded that upon examination I (hall not pa lie for arrogant, in undertaking ere I leave thee ( by Gods blefling ) to demonftrate. Com- r ' pare the 4. v. of Rev. 21. with Jfaiah 6%. 1 o treat- 5? 0f K01 tog of the New heavens, be. Ue voiLf weeping fhall no more be heard, nor the voice of Crying. Nay % of this, I more, [e] Death it felfalfo is taken away as well in rc how Jfaiah Chap.25. 8. ( handling the fame performance ZdtJrZ too ) as in the Apocalyps. He will fwalL up death fene ^ made room for another, for 'tis evident death cntred in by fin, aTa'lfoThanhe world could new; have contained all'generat together, fo ,ha diversVc W Mg we a»d hi™ [ <* ] The fame fhe fhall were that wor-at that Day, call him I (hi i, e. My h tub and. Certam- *ilpt Baalim, ly Jfraelin kind, and no way deducible to the prefent i Kings 1*. Goi pel-condition. Korean the preilure of fuch texts ** " ' be That the foremention'dquotations muft be verified ex- V, p licit ely oft he jews. ( 7) be eluded by conftruing them of the Gentiles as a fuccedaneous, or fuccenturiated Jfrael- f0T St. Taut ( you heard ) affords us [b ] warrant to giv* verdiaftj Kom. u. ror the J e w in propria perfona. • i j. Thus far I am fure we are right, provided thefe promites be not fullfild in the Jews former deliveran- ces ; To him that thinks they are, it ought to leem but reafonable that he fliould acquaint us with that time nr which Jerufdlem was cleaned from all her filthinefs, A heart of flefh given her, and her fiony one takfn away, as is promis'd 36. the paffage lo lately urg d And 'tis worth the knowing, when f udab znd Jfrael ever liv'd together ( fince their revolt from Rehoboam ) and were one Nation, not , twoany more : for lb they muft, 37. 22. &c. free from Idolatry and all abominations, [e] fecure (Vi-Nay, and from the moleftation and domipion of their enimies, & planted in brought with lo remarkable renown from all the bor- *hcir own land ders of their captivity, that other deliverances fhall be a?TCr tobc all this to happen to them in the dayes of Davids fore of m*ef- righteous branch, The Lord our right ewfnefs- where- to b« as in our Lord Chrifts laft abode amonoft them Thev c/cacd-^ neither dwelt together as one NatioS, C fori hope we have not forgot the then deadly fewd betwixt • the/*w, and Samaritan,) nor free from iubie&ion to their Domineering Enimies the Romans,Ez,^ U 28. much lefle were they void of tranf'greflions, hek. * 37.13. but guilty of the higheft Treafon that ever the fun behe d. In a word; if this ftite (h* the Pro- phets) be that ofNew-J^r. in Rev. zs the next pa- ragraph will afTert, we may I.hope reftfecure till we arrive at the iecond Chapter, where 'twill be prov'd < that the Magnalia there mention'd begin at Chriftsfe« cond coming. But how after all this, if thefe inftances from the Prophets aim at one thing, and that in the*%ev. a- nother? on (8) nother, the former poimingat a Glory on earth, die later, in heaven? Affinkiein words, I mutt needs : grant, is no conviction that the macter Ihouid be the lame; though truly it migbebe much wordredat, that fo exa& an agreement ftiouid thread the phages of both places, and yet the things be feverai; but I pre- fume .this following anfwer may remoove the fcruple; That nape we are affuredby Rev, 10. 7. that there is Id] May it a .[ d ] myftery declar'd to the Prophets, to receive bk that>the accomplifhment under the 7. Trumpet, And that this Myftery here we have here treated on is declar'd through the whole hgnifiesthe ftream of prophecy, and to commence alto at the 7. J Rom. 3.25. Which our Tranflation renders a Propitiation, but it is the Very word us'd Heb. 9. 5. and there tranflated Mer- cy-leat. Secondly, Chrift is [/] exprefly called Gods [/] Rfy.ij. ] Tabernacle, by the expofition of the beft Interpre- *< ters, meaning thereby the Humane Nature of Chrift, which the Beaft ( The Papacy ) blafphemes by his opinion of Tranffubftantiation, which fhews forth a pecce of Bread for the real Body of our Lord, and worfhips it for his natural Flefh, In this very noti- on is that of St. Joh. Chapter 1.14. The word was made Flejh and dwelt among ft us i. e. Tabernacled,the very word in the Rev. So 'joh.1 II. Deftroy this Temfle, & > - f; ^vtiAi.v, Woriil c xx; World be intltled on him ctherwife than by this my* fterious cranfa&iou to be finiflu on earth? Again, Compare Rev. 9. 14. where thefixt Trumpet con- fills in looting the Angels bound in Euphra- To tes &c. with %ev. 16.12. where [aa] Euphrates is furc us thsc dryedup, id eft, The fixe trumpet ended. For if the ?^3gc * matter of the trumpet were the letting loofe the An-Xd feethe gels, or overflowing of Euphrates (probably thewonderfullac- Turks ) then the drying up of Euphrates muft needs cord ic car~ be the concluding of the Trumpet, fo much is evident rie/ with E" Now the end of the fixt muft needs be the entrance ting Jf Got 7- Therefore the [ b ] Kings of the Eaft ( with- judgment on out doubt the Jervs to impartial Readers.) enter at G1>and the beginning of the 7. for to that very end is Suphra-^, ^lBoft tes dryed up that a way may be prepard for the Kings ffiS £ of the Eaft. Compare Rev. 1.7. with Z^. 12. on which foi 10. and St. Matth. 24. 30. From all which ( mutu-lows JfiMts- ally reflecting on each other, as the margent informs reftitmi°n- you ) it. refults byapowerfull confent,that time\f And^t of the Jewi feeing and mourning after him they have all this is£ peirced, is his coming in the clouds. That Chapter ofbceffededae Zach . cannot be. deny'd to be a defcription of Jer the tim® here reftoring from the 6. v. to the end, fo that the 10. vlru (now quoted ) to which the 9. Ieades us by thtTth^&c hmphalis of That day, muft be granted to treat of Where their converhon. It will therefore be but equal thatJ<" done, we either yield that day here pointed at to be tht f|!rc cbadSe fame with what the two parallel texts referr to, or els CoMS 1-1 product frem the fcriptures fome other in which they Rev^ij. lhall lee and mourn after him, whom they have peir- a^he 7. viall, ced. Befides, 'Tis obfervable, the word in both thefe ^^ texts of the New teftament is the very fame (though c'om^" ^rc ftlio til proclamation to the fowles,&c: at the 17. v. inwith R&^iy^t Certainly, one and the fame conoueft over the Churches Enimies, Amichrift. lb} Remember the glorious royalty of this bulinefs. every icftupon any ** ^ ^^lh,t of thc E*ft C 2 Others (I*) » others might have fupplied it) with that which the 7o. ule in {a] Zach. and were it not Orange if the ble^to take fenfe (h^uld be diveric? may we not rather think^ that notice thac in \c hath pleas'd the fweetnefs of the Spirit to chuie the all the federal fame vvord) pUrpofely to guide us into the fame expe- thTdkcfull°f ^tion. For unleflfe this fight of him were intended as Woe,by weep- an extent of mercy to them that peirc'd him,(w*That ing, wayling. Nation,) it had not ( fure ) been expreft by Mourning gnafhing buthowling.Tell me now dothnot,«heChrftiaRChurch wuh,howling C0Jftantjy underftand his coming to judgmem by his New Tefta- coming in the clouds ? for fo Holy Darnel hath taught ment, this us to tpeak(for fr m thence is the phraleborrow'd)Drf. word is never „ vdiich very place (for the %gv. and other ufed,( though pans 0f teftament concentre as perfeftly texts never £ with the Prophets about this Date of the atcheive- alterd,) asifment, as about the thing it ielf ) in the 14. 22. and the Blefled 27. verfes, ai'it apparently defcribes this royalty,lb Spirit had pe- ^ pJtcheth it at his coming (in the clouds ) to judg- • lathisglWr" ment, and overthrowing the, proud horn, which is phraie, left moft afluredly [ b ] Antichrift ( for al] our Synod an- the meaning notations) as every fenfible Reader may judge by com- flvould be paring his defcription with that of the beaft, %ev. clouded by a- r ° \ ny fuch flain u upon the word. [ b ] The controvert shout Antichrift hath no way been niore obfeur'd than by applying to St. Ptuls man of fin and the Apocalyptical whore,that which is fptf e of Antichnft n S^Johrt: Epiftles. That by the Man of fin. and whore, is meant the R/manift, I dare fay is demonstrated, by that moft incomparable hghtof our N«io.' Mr. to unprcjudic d minds. As for the Name Anricbrjft'tis never us'd eithe'in the Rtvt or S u?my lothat tis the libertvofthe Churches fpeakiog (not {crip ure appellation,)that irapofeth the cerm Antichrift on the whore,and while we flare to (quarc St. Epift. that way to®, we fotarigh*. the cafc. For Kom denies not the father, and he Ton, I Epift. St. John i. 11. 'Tis moft. deer therefore that S>. fobn refers to the falfe Chriftspredifted by our Saviour.for the immediate Antecedents of Jet. ruin, S. Man, 14. U.i J. S. Mmk t$• *»• An abominable talfe- Prophet, of which for* being then in the*o Id, and of great Note, vi\. Omon AI*ih*> befides Ctrmtim, and the curfrd Gnoft.cb, &c. for there were many fuch A*- tichrifts faith S. M 8. This to be his meaning appears by thele follow- ing Charaders from the context. E.tft 'tis pr«p< u.ded by him at that 18. v.by way of citation, and reference to fomc other fenpture. A& J* hm tu) Sic. But'tis no Where els to be heard than from the EvangeKfts fo treating che'warning peeces to Jer. deftrudion. The words Amichrift andfalfe Chrift never occurring in the whole Bible but in the Gofpels and his Epift. Secondly 'Tis inflane'd by S. Job, as formerly prefag'd by fome other fcripture, and now us'd in way af Argument by hmfelf for an immediate fon unner otfomelaft hour( for fo the Greek fpeaks.) and as a plain mamfeftation that that laft hour was then a running, forafmuch as the Badge of it (1Anthhiift ) was fo vifiblc. All which things were moft exaftly verified ( both as forelpoken to fuch a premonition by the Evangel, asalfo fulfill'd inthele'ud Deceivers of thac Age ) at the time of St. Johns writing thefe Epift. being hard upon the fatal accomplifhment of thefe truths, in that remarkable calamity which fhort- 1 y after came upon Jtr. Now after all ths, will not the intimation ( I pray ) of laft hour be more naturally appliabie to that de folat ion (then at hand } than to any thing yet to be expetf ed,it being above 1 <00.years fince th s was fyoken? For though the laft times (in regard to Dan. fourth Monarchy ) are fpoke of us, yet fure the laft hour ( fo longagie mentioned) is more happily applied to a matter already paft. 13. So that here you fee where Sc. Paul learnt (be- fore the %ev. was extant ) that Antichrift fhould. be deftroyed ac our Loids coming, 2 Thef. .2. 8. I will fubjoyn othyr. Arguments by way of appendence, purpofely not to tire the Reader with too continu'd a length of any Chapter without taking refpite. As St. Paul was formerly our warrant, for apply- ing thofe admirable glories,mention'd by thePiophets, to the J:ws reinfratichment,. fo he feems full-as deer in ranking its accomplifhment under the contempo- raries of the 7. Trumpet. I know not how it may appear to others, but Imuftconftffe I cannot fo un- dervalue the Holy Apoftles Logick , as to judg that he (hould fe;ch a Medium from a prophecy of the Jews reftitution, to prove the day of judgment by> and yet not intend to lay the date of that Reftitution,. at the time of judgment,look %o.m> 14^ 11. W* (hall all ftand before the judgment feat afChrifi ; For it v. u written, As I live faith the Lord every knee (hallbow to me, But where is it written ? fave Jf. 45. 2 being a peece that belongs moft affuredly to this mat- ter from the 14. v. to the end of the Chap. Compare (*4> I pray that i pv.There {hail come overt o thee in Chains Cc. with Jf. 60. 14. and give your judgment if thev mean not the lame thing, for fo lam i'ure the [a] Jews W Can any alwayes expound it ; And however we throuoh mif- take are wont to affix a mark at the 20. v.'of the 45. Chap, intimating a different argument, yet that the impartial Reafon dc fpife the ment in our Chriftim •afes ? lpue the ' . . / , ° ~ vuwu.gvuin.ui, yet mat tne Hrength ofu- wh0'e lc(3uele naturally appertains to the fame dif- nivcrfal Tra- courle, let any impartial peruier judge by the «enu- dmonamongftinecharaaers emergent from the context, efpedailv the fiaft uvcrfe> Lbein- LdoubtIcf*> not abrupt True and one- Parcc11 0l,a changed theme, but the united member of ly Chureh of^continud one) In the Lord [hall all the feed of Jf- This' Ytlhe jffied! i Nor is this the one. trmh flciril1^ Apoftle pitcheth the Epocha of this by,in their A- admirable royalty at the coming to judgment. What ges j And yet can amount from 2 Tim. 4. 1 ? I charge thee be- to much mag -fore the Lord Jefm rift, who fhall judgt the quick • & A kingdom joyn d with his appearance to jud°e the world, and yet not the final kingdom for ever to the Heavens, for after the univerfal refurre&ion, our Sa- viour refigns up the kingdom to the father,that he may be all in, all 1 Cor. 15, 24, 28. That kingdom there- fore which is neither before his appearance, not yet after the laft relurreftion, muft neceffarily be conclud- ed between them: Who can but wonder that this Truth fhould be fo boggled at, which is fo harmonioufly accorded to through all the Prophets? Jer.2^.6.&cJn his dayes i''*™}' 34- 23'&c. Ezek. 37.22, 23,24,^,. i a,\from the^.'to the end ? All whtch exprefle a ttloty to [ " ] Jer ( evi- dently to be meant on earth ) to be eftablifht In the tncie things theirM. 37. 21 witbp0inftrt,a.lh* .14. 15. Befidcs, the whole defeription match- t^tloSam^a eth in each place. to be the re' t* m e t ... . „. turn of the i®. t L l chcu' pw 17.17. 'Twill proofs but a very pinch'd Synrchdoche to cramp 10. Tribe J intone perfon. The forecited Chap, of Holy Daniel is worthy of a fecond furvey, being queftionleffe the facred ftore I ufe from whence the defcription of the day of jud<*- . mentis deriv'd info many correfpondencies of the New Teftament, viz. That the [*] (onof man fbaW\Thtvoml~ come m the clouds ; In the Glory of his father, wtth on the his Holy Angels, in reference to the 10. and V*. v Ncw Tc,fta" That : Antifhrtfc fhall be dejiroyed with the kngk-ZTslrtw nefs of his corping, as Daniel had foretold of the little the Con of man Horn, v. 26. That thePeftruttien fhould be by fire, itis C cer- being faid y.9,10. His throne was a fery. flame, and'his /.takci> wheeles as burning fire. A fiery fiream iffnd and came Sin©«r forth from before hims.&c. And why ( I would fain know) may we nothing'hither St. J»bns parallel frdm Rev. 20.4f/ [aw thrones, and they fate upon them, and judgment was given unto them, anfwerino Daniel 7, 9, 10. J beheld till the thrones were pitched down, and the judgment was fett and (v. 12'.) judg- ment -was gmn to the faints of the moft high. What difference (I pray) betwixt St, Johns \ and the faints lived tad .reigned with ChriS ] and Darnels • » (The (t6) [The Saints poffefled the krngdom] viz,. with the ion of man who came in the clouds ? Think other men as they pleafe, I cannot for ray own part be per- fwaded (confidering the wonderfull twift of agree- ment running through the whole fcripture ) but that this kingdom of the ion of man, when the faints (hall reign with him, and all people, nations, and langua- ges fbaJl Terve him v. ["*] 14. is the very fame with [*] VW.l(ev. what hath been fo unanimoufly inculcated lrom the 7. 9. reft of the Prophets, concerning the Jm; converfion, ons, kindrd, ^ Qentiles inlargement. One thing, In the mean * a de- time, I think will icarce be queftion'd, that Daniels fcrip'ion of date feems to be the day of judgment, agreeably to thefaracking- Jr 66. 10. 12. 15. i(5 19. 20. 22. Wheremention " and f^Y indignation to be powrei forth ; citation jufti- The Glory of Jerufalems rcfiauration, and the Gen- ie, tiles fullneffe, with New Heavens, &c. in one and the fame particular. Trrphecy. By this time we may I hope make a fhifttofift out , St. Meters meaning, in referring his Readers to the Prophets, about the fame glory, and the fame com- mencement, vi& . New Heavens , and new earth, wherein dwe.lleth rightetnufnefs, to be founded at his coming, 2. Epift. 3. Chap. i. 4. 13. v. From which Chapter though forae bufie hekds'may poflibly "frame obje&ions to fruftrate the efcpe&attfnj'raited namely from the conflagration, and diflolution here mention'd, yet let them know that by the fame in- duftry, they muft dif&ppoint St. 'Peters meaningtoo, who notwithstanding luch diffolution tenchethus to expe& the accomplishment Fourth-y, Whether this wonderful! concordance of St. feter Tfith the reft of the fcripture ought not toper- D fwade (i8) fwade us that the coming of our Lord here mention'd ( v. 4. ) at which he [b] piccheth this ftacely change, [6] By com-is his expe&ed perfonal coming to judgment arche pariSPhc4/ 7' trumPec> not former vindi&iv;.appearance Vp'rorife\fbit m fury atthc Violation of/^r. by the Romans, to coming, with which the incomparably learned D\ Hammond 13. v. Accord is wont to referrmany palfages of the New T.efta- ingto b'4 pro ment, which (my thinks) in this prefent text, the Sn'y^th?" Arulo8ie t0 other PIaces were iiifficientto diftinguilh? the Promife i,Laftiy» Whether the fcoffing here intimated-^. 3. ran fixtathi* com- be at any thing els [ a ] chan this very opinion, fiuce ing. _ the Opponent,?', e. the Scoffer,difputes direSly againft jtt The tiw-u>but the Rcfpondent, viz. the Apoftlc, pleads ex- Sftdiyes" Pre{%for See all this made good. The Queftion The primitivecontroverfy is about the Promife of Chrifts cora- dsyes being ing, which the Millenary affirms to confift in an un- for . exprefltb'e reftitution.Againft this the [ b ] Scoffer ob- LUT'dl i^s( fo much light the particle [For] will afford face The ' us> u being a caufal Conjun ^hat ^°Pes anY luch change ? ing, for a$ to I ftiould be unwilling to*prevaricate one jot, but his coming have I hope presented the Argument in its natural to judgment (in the general notion) I think never any Chriftians did or will denieit; Nor can any imagine the Apoftle Ihotild bend his aim againft fpecu'a ive Atheifts, ,'uch as LicUti, "piaj>»as&c. For who ever heard or can think that fuch toothlefs Barkers as thofc D->gsare, may be of any dangerous influence to well-grounded Chriftians ? To tnafc upon that fcorc there had not needed fuch carneft incitement ro rcmemb ance and caution, as the Apoftle here ufcth, which certainly^nuft neceflarily import the fcoffing party not oncty 10 be Chriftian but-very conHle- able ;oo A ^ UP> cent of Ldcufts Chap. 9. ) attributes the opening the ^ pit-to the ftarr which " fell {from Heaven, v. 1,2. But binding the what I pray can this ftarr 'be hut Satan? and that in ftrong nun a double capacity, firft as a lapled Angell, lecondly is reckr'nJd in as lately bat d »-m from heaven by: ^oly Michael fvT"^-". Chap. li. 7,9. Again, Thefe Loo,fk>hkd.a King! • . , • - bur Michael W« nor Chr. a? appfaresO^. lo.where Chr. (w^.th' man in lmnem/ f 4:with Rev. 1.1^,14, if.) fpeaks of MicM as one dives s from him,See I«.»I. But efpeciajly the place ditfingnifhetb them Rtv. i 1. 1*. m to the Inhabit, frc. WnercfK f Chip. 10 h - fo b -urtd ^nd fral'd as not able to dcccive or hurt the nations &c. He is (crujy ) Xooxo0 mucti wedded to his ©wn opimoa that wUl not take the fpirits cotument on the action, the the Angel of the bottomleffe pit, whofe name is baddch,t. e. a Dcftroycr; which elogies who ever fhall attribute to any other, he muft begg leave either to in- terpret the bottomleffe pit of tlomewhat els behdes Hell, or the Deftroyer belonging to that pitoffome one els than the Devill. Nor is our evidence lefife cleer for his energy (farr beyond the nature of ligation and fettling ) at the nativity of the Beaft %ev. 13. of whom it is expreflely deliver'd v. 3, that the Dragon gave htm power, and his feat, and great authority. If •either of thefe inftances may fpeak him bound, I think the onely difficulty will be to produce a villany of fo aggravated a malice, whereby ever to affert his * liberty'. But examine we them fomewhat more diftin&Jy. The firft three Spochaes ( yet that way takes the very learned Primate of Ireland) befides what is already obje&ed, implie the Drvill to be bound for that whole fpace in which Bleffed Michael confli&ed with him, Rev. 12. Surely the bitter throwes by which Chrifti- anity wrung in, andthe warm blood of fo many con* ftant Martyrs, were arguments fufficient to make ap- pear that ^Michael had not to deal with a bounden Adverfary. Again, If he were then bound, the little feafon of his loofing Chap. 20. 3. runs on apace to fi- nifti a fcvench centurie, and hath (Seemingly) much overftiot the proportional limits of /u*f« be- ing farr more than hair the in cervail of his binding. Serioufly, I am farr from aiming to blaft any reverend Authorities, but d ubtleffe the Holy Jelus requires more exa& enucleations of his lacred meffages, than either of thefe faint refolutions can amount to. Into fuch intanglements are thole men falln who have orice Slipt the clue of Truth ! Li a word. Can. it confift with Satan in a cage, and coop'd up from abufing the world, that he fliould be able to impofe upon the young -m (I5) • • • the young Chriftiansfo [a] rank a peeceof Lcgerde- theft mane, as by making (hew of miraculous cures, wrought ( I wiis) by the reiiques of Martyrs,to cheat the credu- (doubtlds,) lous world into the cftahlifhrnent of Saint-wcrfliip.u^- (nndnoFto on the miftaken ground (ibgrofly were they abulcd) oiGamets Revel. 20. which prerogative ot the Martyrs reigning jjrdw,>). the with Chrift loco. yrers , they expounded of this * £ Idolatn us Royakie , into which the Dragon had tbus [by ly;ng n.i' oull'd them by the eccantm of thole wondejs , which raJts, after they prefum'd to be the feftques of prcvider.ce as in- tended to point them to luch expeditions. Truly if it * can be prooved that Satan was all this while in his pe,fwaded) dungeon , I ftull be the a pier to think thar he fpake there is no from his hole (through a Trunk ) into Duncan's cru- ojonin cifix, at a Council in Canterbury , Anno Domini 972. JJ^JJ u$ (which falls within his binding , begin the account but (jfwcJ1 ' where ycu pleaie,) uttering an audible voice to this fcarch'dafter) purpofe [Dur.fians cpimon is the right], he at that time was either m- being a moft ardent Pro&our againft the allowance of troduc'd» or «s w & 1 r-i maintain d by Marnage to the Clergy. fuch collufcon. What fhould now deter us from making this dedu- whe- &ion,That this very UMtllennium is that fpace which ther [ Jy by the.lacred writ hath defm'd for thefe myfteries?wor<*s Hearan txprefs from che Spirit, tow/. 20.4. if aw the * * foals of them that were beheaded for the wttnefs of onthc^w. & 20.4. Mti'tto sum ib/ jh & vixirw , & repjanmt. gktmadmodum vidtmxi ttiam fub fidilibm Regit* mq-y frmtif&iu, dim Adowcttiitr, tontra o%uem ttiam corpora i*$rmitattm^c Vamonum tnt'parr ofuvdunt doLim fibi a Dcotruiw, {0) The M'tllen. of ligation is confelfedly itmput dtfimtuK. For after muft he be l«>ofed a little fealbn , F.rgg that of thrifts l(f' gdwis fo too; iince oe and she fame fpacc is meant, (V) If any count me over critical 'n ftreining the Emphalis of (ti) in the Text, their partiality oufcht n tto nuke 1 hem forget with what ztalthe fame obfei Vation is put futd n the difpute of» 'aHt^i:. ) Sure this cxpicflion will no way com- ply with their expofit ion who interpret the firft refuircft.on ofthelifcofgrac«j that notion being difag* eeable to fcparattd fouls, or if it were no', yet could not the reft of the dead, alter the thoufand yeers (fuppoi'd to be the W-ckcd) ever live that life,v.;^. of graced But if we pive way thar : hr fame word {Live in the fpace of one line , may be appliab'eto two fo difte cr.t fenfes, as to iorport the life of Grace to the one fortj and life in its pi oper fewfe t-j the otVcr ? we open E Uich (26) filch a gap of licence to perverfe Cavillers,that by the opportunity of fuch f ee- dom of acceptions they may diftort thefe Holy fimbaflics into what ever com- pliances may beft fute with their defigncs. Jefus t/ind they lived and reigned with Chrift a thoufand jeers, which that we may reft aifured to be the very fame thoufand in which the Devill is bound, the Greek affords an unavoidable evidence , for having expreft the time of Satans binding {yerf. 2.) without an article,it delivers the fame meaiure of Chrifts King- dom with the article as emphatically refitting upon the forelaid thoufand, verf. 4. Where doubt- lels we fhould not have injur'd the idiome ( c'onfide- ring the want offw) in the l'econd verfe,)to have En«- liftit it thofe thousand years. Now fay in pood earneftj Is it not more than likely that St. Teter intended the fame thing , remembring , 'twas the Jewifh pavapl.rafe (as you heard) of the Day of Judgment, [Oneday with the Lord is as a thoufand yeers] to which St. Peter (fure) alluded ? I fhall not need to tell you of the ex- tant tradition of old Eli as , ( a Jew that liv'd under the fecond Temple ) to this fenle. 'Twere handfomer for us to remember (with lome reverence) that the moft inlightned , the moft pious ages, and the moft fruitfull of Zelous Martyrs through all the Chriftiari times , were of this minde too. And peradventure, it might do us no injury to reflet that in the thirteen u!followin8 Centuries ( which oppos'd it) Antichrift (a) The Sod- both gain'd and kept his footing by the advantage of mans and An- that overfight. ans, &c. have Give fcntence now impartially if this Incomparable warrfdus that keauty ^rae>' commence not at our Lords next co- wanton wits ming, and if the commenfuration of thefe Tranfcen- mayintangle denciesbe not (inthe facred language) the day of any Troth Judgment. What now though fome obje&ions may with very per- jnterfeer ? n0t readily to be refolv'd * Myftery ( my jmmtrica- might eafily ftop fuch (a) gaping mouthes. But for ( *7 j for reconciling the difficulties emergent from this Te- net, I hope hereafter ^as the Lord (Ir s:! Lend me affi- ftance and time) to appear to thv World with more ample fatisfa&ionjTili thettgiv: me leave fuccin&'y td propoJe a few fuggeftions, to abate, at ltaft, the vigour of relu&ancies. If any (in the firft place ) conceit that this larger duration than they have hitherto imagiii'd leads into too grofs conceptions of that divine Aflize , as if caufes before the Searcher of Spirits requir'd fo flow a di'.cuflion, as before our earthly Tribunals ; Let fuch obje&ors know , that fcruples of this kinde pro- ceed meerly from the miftaken notion which them- felves have fram'd of that Terrible Day; prefuming it C1) JeeEj to confift onely in fome (horter hearing and deciding H or the 1 260 Diyes> (being the Vimi- ftoodonthe ted cycle of the beaft and his contemporals in the Sea) as evi- Revel.) there (hall be no [a] longer time, but thismy- dently appears ftery fhall be fulfil'd, nothing els fhall intervene, but JLSES. thel'eventh Trumpet foall iound. That I have not tion verfe the mifcommented upon this lacred Oath read the fixt and firft. leventh verfes together, and try if thoucanft find any [ai Suitably to otjjer meaning. Again, examin the 5,6, and 7. verfes ffpeaki"* of of this ChaPter in the by D*»> 12. and 7. this myftery) The [£] perfonin both places ftanding upon the wa- I the Lord will ters, lifting up his hand to heaven , and fwearing by fcaftenit in him that liveth for cver.but in holy Daniel particular- ly he ly qxpreffing the Time,Times,and half a Time. Lord 1 Revtl. fo in that mcn eycs in heat^s ftouJd ftumble in pan. he that fo plain a way , and rather expound this in Daniel of takes this oath ^Antiochus Epiphanes ( be their account [ by Days] "^hn.fthim-never f0uneven ) than allow it (in its genuine deer- toafford a?y 1'glit towards lo delpis'd a truth. /i»««Jofwhom °ne thing I am iure of, that the cnuntre-intcrpreta- fce Dan. 10. J, tions to this opinion, are fore'd , hal'd and per dures, 6. with&v, 1. but fuch as run with it facil and natural, it being i?»»4>if. (without queftion) an incomparable advantage to the extricating many Knots in the Bible, cou'd we but once conquer that pecceof pride (which we know who is fo chid for) in efteeming our lelves more infallible than the firft three hundred yeers. 'Tis often ask't how can thefe things confift , fince the notion of Judgment imports a diftribution of Juftice according to every ones works, allowing no capacity for conveifion? fo that ifth£ Jews return be not till our Lord appears in the clouds, how is it that they perifii ' notamongftthe enemies of his Kingdom whereof they ' are are the principal ? I will return ( for anfwer ) the words of that admirabje Divine Mr. (JMede (a gentle- man certainly of as deer a brain as ever the world could boaft of) I falve it with a fuppofition of [erne (a) [4] No- w'llit latitude in that appearance, ai being firft to be uttered one j t take with fome preparation or preludium tothe JemfhNation, off tllC ; / J , . ' ' , ! r , • \ .1 1 1 exactrefs or before hu great and umverfal appearing to the whole thc -tjuft].< Read the Blefled Angels comment chorow. [. He fhall go before him in the fpirit and power of-ghas, to turn (or reftore) the hearts of the Fathers to the Children, and the difo- bedient to . the wifdom of the Juft, , to make ready a people prepared for the Lord; to Wiethe fhall teduee the difobedient offspring who now kick at Chrift , to the wifdom and piety of the moft zealous of their Fa- thers , &c. This (by the way) is moft lure, that the Gentiles in Chrifts former coming had gafn'd little by this promile, in being effected upon them,namely [ re- ftoring the hearts of the fathers to- the children,J their Artceftry being all Pagan. As to the main difficultie of the Apocalyptical Gog on ;' iGog and fwarming, and peiiflilng at the end ' of the iooo. years; I commend every fober Reader to the learned ditcourfe of the worthy Mr. Mead, whole - .judgment about it was exceeding iblid , and vertuoufiy modeft, ( as truly in all his tenets j. and to powerfully convincing, that no vtforfe man than Dr. fwiffe ad- mir'd hisdifcovery,; Be onely thus far advertis'd, that Cjog and Magog in the Revelation, are very far dif- ferent from thofein Ez,ek.cap. 39. the one namely, to be deftroy'd at the beginning, the other at the end of that renowned chiliad ; So hath it pleas'd hiswif- dome, with two fiery conqueW to begin and end that Terrible Day ^ The Dawning whereof, or begin- ning of the Millennium is attended with the fiift re- furre&ion, and the morning-judgmeut on the then- appearing enemies of his Kingdom; the evening, (hut ! • up with the univerlal refurre&ton , and the final ih- perdition of the latter GVgand Magog, with the Caft- ing of Satan into his everlafting dungeon. There's none I hope will to diftruft Gods provi- 1 " , * dence, as to queftioli the means of deliverance from the wrathful! flames of that day. How eafy is it for the\God we fevve to. fend forth fire with a limited commi0\op ? The guard of/Angels upon the ele& ( Matt Ik 2 4. 31.) is neither weak norTubje& to 0- verfight. The God of the Chriftians can fecure us ( if he pleale) without findging in the midft of the furnace, Dan. 3. 27. Or peradvenruve the objeds of that fury (hall be feparated within the appoimeddifts ef' vengeance. Who; can lay, but that Holy JoeJ'svMkf. fM Quxre ifof * 3- I*- and Sz.John's [") Ar- the vafley be rnageddon, Rev. 16. 16. may intimate loifle fuch not S. Johns thing ? And why may not St. Tauls catching up in Arraag. the clouds, and meeting our Saviour in the air? point atibme miraculous refcue from that burning oven Mi, F.om may not perchance work much upon any, - to Htsyt Tjbbi Eliot, that the Jewf can produce a [ * J tradition to this pur- (33) purpofe, farr Elder than the dayes of our Saviour, though of this I am certain, that the Apoftlesin their writings alluded to divers paffages for which there is no other Teftimony extant in the earth fave Jewiih '» traditions. 'Twill ( I dare fay) pofe the concordance to find where the Arch-Angel difputed with the Devill about the body of Mofes, verf. 9. of S. Jade. And who could be angry with me if I fliould tell him the Apoftle feems to fpeak wide enough from their l'enfe that prelume this catching up tq be our immediate tianfport to heaven ? He expreffeth hitn- felf (me thiuks ) warily enough to avoyd that mif- take, by Cloudes, and Air, left ( poffibly ) we might imagine Heaven to be meant, whereas we meet with many other places where this caution is not fo curi- oufly prompted, e. g. The fowles of heaven or of the air indifferently, for in the Hebrew notion the air is comprehended under the name of Heaven, bnt here ( though the hebraifm would have allpw'd it) no mention of heaven, but clouds and air. Confi- der well the context 1 Thejf. 4.14. Thofe that pep in J ejus- will g0d bring with htm, not carry with him. Does not [ Bring with him ] imply the immedi- ate ftage ( after the fiery vengeam* ) to be the earth, not heaven ? Again, Thofe that pep in Jefus, not all the dead, wUh'Gvd bring with him, So v. 16. The dead in Chri ft flail rife firft. 1 What think you of the firft and fecond refurre&ion, moft' exa&ly parallel to .1 Cor. 15 .23, 24. Of an order in the reiurre&ion* Chrift the firft fruits, afterwards,they that are Chrift's at his coming j not all the dead at Chrift's coming, butr * f, they that are Chrift'sj remember that; [a] AfterwardsS^fo^ dring it [Af- terwards] I demand why our Tranfiation turn'd the former word fo, the two words being of the very fame cognnion and extent, the one eine words of equal force aad mean'ng,(difter'ng no way, bur one made of the after) To avoid this rock, they Englifot th • fisft, Afterward, /implying the refpit of ab-jvc rT0 be lelfe than [•] fpiritual,andof quite another pi ^VtTf* mode than the fafhion of this world; which confiderai fec jBb.1s.19. tion alone, I am deceiv'd if it doe not fully extricate Whew the thofe words of our bleffed Saviour, which fome havf k,lc*isjfnti'demade ufe of for their cheif argument againft this ™ phrafe apprehenfion J^« 18. 36 My kingdom »not[*]of [ je mi m of this world: Tis not faid (tn ) but ( of) viz,, not af- tbt mid 2 ter the manner of worldly pompe, or adminiftration,; w. not word-not of the fame notion with what flefh and blood - fuggefts, (37) . fuggefts. or our (hallow capacities are wont to ap- prehend, briefly ( as himfelf expreffeth it) not from hence, but outof Heaven from God, %ev. 2. and every way aHeavenly glory,though on earth. Mean what it will, (for I never incourag'd to too much boldnefs in this myfterious abyfs)'Ti> certain we fmd(^M/.(*) 3.21.) a diftinft throne appropriated to _ Chrift from that which belongs to his Father. I will Tim. not multiply Texts till I have gain'd fome footing , at The final |Io- what time fome I dare fay will wonder tV'te what ry inhcavenii (otherwife inextricable ) problemes this cj^e may dif- (furcly) (he in tangle. Jake one other, which if well lyiderftood ^ c fpeaks-To home , that it can never be avoided by any \ j^/jj. that underftands the Greek. Hebr. 1. 0. A — Erg0 the fons —tit rit e/«it|M'nr- Our Tranflators (to avoid this proof) throne muft do ftrangely tranlpofe [Again] contrary to the order m"n fomc- of the Greek,that it may have reference to [he faith,] ™ ~^ by way of a new quotation , and not to [bringeth,] be meant of 1 But how dilingenuoufly, let any judge. Befides, while his prefenc by fuch a tranfpofition they indeavour to refer the Kingdom meaning of the pafl'age to Chrifts former coming, do jJ^J^ not they diametrically ftruggle againft St. Paul, who Hearts fin our determineth his meaning to his next coming Heb. mortal ftatej 2. 5? and that in the fame word too, [tmp/w, ] which being pro- all thatunderftand the Greek know to fignify moftj*J"d^«* properly, ftri&ly and unavoidably [The Earth,] It be-ward?and not ing a participle of the feminine gender, us'd in fingle, as a prefent fuppofing >»f to be underftood, e. g. «<**/«'»« >*, The in- fruition,for we habited Earth. Read then the Text according to the arc buJvMo\ original, and judge. [ And when he (a) bringeth again 7? the firft begotten upon the earth he faith , But bim that over- Lord ! what pains fome men will take to fool them- ctmth mil I felves out of truth ! One thing may not be pretermit- iimytyf nath the fignificat'on of the future tenfe, being the fecond aorift of the lubjun&ive Mood , befides, 'tis joyn'd with «o*<» , Again], fo that «im «Af iwyiyi] ought (inftrfctnsfs) to be re wlwd iAnA when be fhall bring , &c.\ V 3 ted, (38) 1 ted, that the text (as indeed the whole context) im- plies fome very glorious matter * which ( if S. Paul may be allow'd the Judge of his own fenfe) is deter- (b) By turning min'd to (b) wm'w The Earth to Come. What it The mid to difference now between Saint Pauls ftate of the earth would fbem to " ^d Meters new earth? mean the Kingdom of glory, but we fhall find that the world in that fenfe is always iitit and ««» but no where in all the Bible bt^n»*«. .-MfUll* B: Chap. IV. Brlefij jbewfag the ufe of this Tenet. »Ut to what purpofe is all this? May we not be )lay'd without the knowledge of it ? Yes, I doubt not, or els, God help 1 But in the firft place , 'Tis I am lure no great bleffing to ftand in the number of /uchas S. 'Peter brands for Scoffers, nor certainly any fmall exemption to be deliverd from that rable. Second- ly, if it were propos'd fo many thouland yeers agoe as a matter of forich confolationto the hearers at that di- ftance, it affuredly cannot want its Trealures of felici- ty, (if well examin'd) to us who in all likelyhood live jufton the borders of lb great a mutation; lam Aire much neerer than the ancient Jews. Thirdly it would take off a great ftumbling-block,and hindrance to con. verfion, from the poor miftaken Jew, who (being for- tified with fo univerfal tradition of Anteftry ) upon this ftock , both hates and fcorns us ; And count we it a fmall thing to be inftrumental in fo great a work •Seethe 137*towards Ifrael ? for whom the Deareft Jdus hath * yet Pjal. and the fo yerning bowells that he will blefrthem that blefs Jf' Jnd,iI4,ch'her ? Numb. 24. 9. What though the plenteous vin- * * over' tage of their return be not expected till our Lords com- ing, yet think we not thjLt lpme few clutters of grapes would be an acceptable offering unto our Lord ? How : ardently (39) \ ardently might it affe& the defpifed Hebrew to fpie the oracefull port-ay of his hopes in our New Teftament ? How could his heart perfift fo irrationally obftinate,as not ftraitway to yield our Jel'us to be their Mefliah , did but cur Commentators dandle their rugged foules by the gentle parallels of our Teftament with theirs , and Kindty point from %evel. 1. 7. to Zach. 12.10? By which feftque tliey might loon difcern that this is He , whom they once fo bfrbaroufly piere'd , and for whom (at * his itfxt coming ) they fhall mourn with * Th* Jtxn t© fodeep compunaion. But while theyobferve us todi- ftort the Scriptures (in avoidance of this opinion; by jjcfl)ah ^ rouchand unnatural expofttions, ingroffing all to * our fore the day of felves and defrauding their expe&ations of fuch pro- Judgment, ut miles, 'in which I dare fay they have the better half: ^ they are fcandaliz'd at our partiality , deride our gid- of £ofp;I_ dinefs, and grow confirm'd in their infidelity. Foutth- times,&c. ut ly, it were the way to avoid almoft every herefy that fupra. now reigns, fince there can fcarce one be namM, which hath not been built upon the miftaken grounds of this opinion. Thus Vavtfor Vowel Imps his fa- „ J aion upon this ftock, counting the Kingdom of the v { Saints to be ereaed in his tribe. The Anabaptifts in Germany ( and the Levellers , their offering , here,) pleaded that they were the Saints that muft inherit the earth. Nay , it is wonderfull, that Popery , and ma- # ny other « abominations crept in by the overfioht of this tenet. Laftly , It opens an eaiy pollibihty lor the numerous a- interpretation of many knotty perplexities in Scripture, o^gus. about which the weaknefs of fome . the countrefl ifes of many . and the uncertainty of all, make our Com- mentators ridiculous, and our Religon fubjea to con- tempt. I could name divers, (and hope to do lo in an sfter-treatife) But now 1 aim at briefnefs. Chap. (40) Chap. V. v' 4 • Shewing, that by mifunder(landing this opinion, the femes mifiook Chriji, and the Gent lis let in Antiehrijl. -11 1 a 'Hat the Meffiah was expe&ed by the Jews in tht __ age our Saviour was born, is io clter.chat it needs *Chap.?.»4,no proof, Daniels + WEEKS had fo daded them to the very time; From hence arole their fwelling hopes that the Kingdom of God (hould immtdiatly ap- . pear, S. Luke 19.11. Which appreheftfion, tc as ma- thc feme King- nY as underftood it (a) rightly, the Holy Spirit never dom, though taxeth, but backs it with a gracious elogie, S. LMark^ undcratwo- 15. 43. Lake 23. 51. Luke 2. 25. 37. 38. But fold ftate as a- ayas j the traditions of the Elders had interlac'd it from Dan'1. many W lecular appertenancies , and exter- &c> ' ' nal pageantryes, that the fubtil Dragon by this ad- (fy About that vantage daZZeld their fancyes with the glaring fplen- time AUthe dour 0f their miftaken , and falfly pitched pomp , Eaft (as Tm- thereby the eyes of that unhappy age , now ( God expedeTa * wot >) mac^c W fuch fpangling flafhes3quite over- King to rule lookt the meaner oblcurkie of his former coming , overthewholc through their ill-manag'd conceptions of that mil-re- world. prefented glory. Upon this miftake they proceeded , ( John 6.) being convinc'd by the miraculous enter- tainment , that he was that Prophet in whom thefe glorious promifes ( mifmterpreted ty them ) were to find accompUlhment, to make him a King. verfe 14, *R«v. n. 16.15. Thus in a word they overfaw that * morning-ftar, becaufe their abufed minds had not learnt to look for him in that duskie cloud of his firft appearance , nor rightly to diftinguifh of his two-fold coming, whereas the paffages for both , through the whole Scriptures, werefo deer and pregnant, that it had been impoflible for (40 for any Sophifter below the Devitl to have fruftrated their perfpicuity ; nor he ( I think ) by any weaker (hade than the power of darknefs. 'Twas a feat of the fame hand that juggl'd Anti- ehrift into the world; for this moft lovely beauty within fome while contra&ed fo much fdyl(through the odious defilements of unworthy minds j that by zealous Eufebius'sdzyes many confcientious profeflors chofe rather to gainfay the authority of the * Apoca- * Eufcb. was lyps it felf,than afford enrerteinmetit to what they con- one ofthofe ceiv'd fo ridiculous a vanity. The Devill could wilh for no greater averfenefs than to become lo fhie, as ra- jy hisbeft to ther to deny Scripture than embrace a truth ! About undermine the thofe times the accurfed Julian muft needs inquire offav.oftringc! Apollo's Oracle concerning his Perfian War,where the cunning Devill turns fullen , and would not be flat- cerd by his many Sacrifices to the favour of an anlwer, At laft4iis Coynefs ( being follicited Why fo mute ) wascourted forfooth into this'fly return,that the corps (I wis) of Baby la* the Martyr (buried neer his temple in Daphne) flopped his wind-pipe. Babylas is forth- with (at the Emperours appointment) diflodg'd by the Chriftians, ( when without doubt reliques of fo apparent an efficacy were covetoufly fnatch'd at by the remoovers ) fo that a conceit was quick- ly fprung , that other Martyrs bones might befoun<| upon triall as terrible to the Devill as thofe of Ba-' „ bjlas , which was no fooner effayd , but expe- rience presently verifi'd it wkh improvement, and all the world fo rung with wonders done by Martyrs, that even holy men were at length lurprifed , and carried Wonder away with the power of delufion • No more need now^^®^ of questioning the (a) Revelation ; Nay , but ftiakep0fcr«ofthls truth, fhould anciently challenge tho Revel- for this Myfterie i$ fo clofely interwoven with that facred Book, that it is impoffible for rational and impartial men to re- tein the one and rcjeift the other. See Revel. 10.7* (bap. 11.1 f.cbap-zo. 4, cbaf, a 1. all oyer, paralleld with Prop. &c, G hands (40 hands and be friends rather, for Heaven hath refolv'd the controvertie—Thus divers ran a gadding after the Dragons lure , and fhordy fell to luch expofitions of Revel. 20. 4. ( about the Martyrs reigne) as might leem to etlablifh Saint-worfhip cam pdvilegio , and atdTimda*'11 aut^oriZe ^ ^ invocations upon the avouc'nment mentaU* or of providence it lelf , v. [npra.^ of Antichrift, is fpititual-foroicitioa , or plurality of obje&s in divine worlhip, for this caufe is it laid, The More of Babylon , not, the Lyar, Murdrels, Or Tyrant of Baby- lon ;fo that the rfte of Saint-worlh'p is certainly the Epocha of Antichrift. But thou wilt marvail Reader how th s abomination furpnz'd (in a manner} the whole Chrift an world fhortly after the time of Julian, this cheat ( no doubt ) ptooying an unimaginable fnarcto the inadvertent Chr;ftians. Chap. VI. Humbly prefenting to all Chrijlian minds certain chambers from the facred Bible, whichfi em to : denote that Thif Dreadfull Day , which (hall burn like an oven> ts hard by upon us. IN the firft place it is moft certain that there is a li- mited time , cleerly expreft in the Revelation, upon [hi Lord 'that rhe firing whereof hath paft an oath from (c) Chrift fwears, and Himfelf, that time Hi all be no longer, Revel. 10. 6. this the mea- /Fhislimit isdeclar'd to be 42. months, %evel. 1 3. 5. fure of rime, or 1260. day ts, chap. 11. 3. chap. 12. or a Ttme, 2-St Times*nd half a time ' ch' 12- T4* bei"g all but the pitch'd, See a- vari°us expreflions of the fame Meafure (viz,, of the We,from Beaft , and his costaneans,) So many dayes making Holy Dan. cap. exa&'y 4 2.months,and thole months amounting juftly 11.7. Where £0 jime ^jmeSj ancj an t0 wit,three yeers and a tLn'Tc in the half. If now the Spirit hath alfo determin'd whether Oath) Time, Times, and half a Time. Befides, 'tis the bound of Antichrift, the Beaft, cap. i 3. f.) whofedeftruftion we know to be at the day of judgment, 1 Thejfal. a. 8. Ht fupra. " this c 43) this period be meant literally for 3. fingle ysers'rfd a half, and manifeftly propounded where the account /hall begin , we can not lure be fo irrational but to conclude this to be an incomparable aS of favour in , \ T«, our Lord (to afford his Church fo fweet a (a) warning, hepleas* To' and incouragement to vigiiancy ) and a moft rude ne- deal with his gi ea in our 1'elvesifwe de-ipife fo great- falvation : But PeoPleconcer- (really) both thefe doubts are explain'd, (and therefore ninShis*l ft Reader, truft our Bleffed Jefus on his Word, for the^asaifo Apocalyps, ( as thou fhalt fee ere I conclude) unties about the de- all the obje&ions to the contrary.) The former, aboutftru,ftion ot the undemanding of the Dayes, is apparently difco- Je,.ufalcm» verd to be (b) Prophetical, ( namely Dayes for Yeers) StVwo^f cap.11. Ic being the ipacc of the Witneffes prophecy- fagesofashigh inginlackcIoth,^ and ^he Dragon maul'd by a tempcft the beginning It this therefore fliould be the paffage at which the llf^SB. i f" 7 aimes'(and Praycrfpeaksas fair for W- ffwead " £ ^ ' a$ 5hVempert to the Dragon,) then it guides down can " not bc far't0 0Ur P™™ s end. I am lure ( how- to about ever) thou canli not but take notice of fome admi I determin rable exa&ne!s ( mean what it will ) that about the irrh the Em/ire,fliouid be ^ ^ «thee Reader » C; verting ( to their creation at Povver) the principles of our holy faith, diftra&ing us lurory houres) into infinity of fchifmes, and varieties of opinion; and to addid (upon all oportunities) intuiting over our weaker £a- foCmmaVnufa° teckumeni i Where's now your Proteftant Church ? Aureor'othcr, Can there any fix of your Minifters be producd that whereby they confent ( univerfally ) in one belief ? nay can ye pro- become profi- duce any minifters at all?Have not your felves confeft cients not on- (an(J 0ften ftrUgoled in the Controverfie ) (b) No Bi- but'mechanick ' m Mim$er1>Epifcopacy being the known and knowledge on£ly through all ages by which minifters were too; whatever initiated into their function, &c. In plain tevmes this thou thinkft blow fiabs usto the hear-t, the truth being a gran- feemes no lefs/ccl cnc>and made good by thofe two admirabTe Lights tome than a Hammond and D. Taylor, againft all the Presbyte- head-form po- riansin Chriftendom. Judge ro w whether the Prote^ licy of the Dragon; for by this epportunity they iflce out among the reformed Churches fome for gifted Shoomakers , others, for infpir'd Wearers, &c. to the under- mining of our Reformation. (b) Whatever excufc maybe found in this matter for other Reformed Churches (who arc wont to plead neceffity) can no way (as f I fee) relieve the Presbyterians of England, where Epifcopacy, was wilfully, in- l confiderately, abominably, ("and well if not facrilegioufly) rejected by them. ftant- \ ftant-Prophets be not (c) dead,which cannots (at pre- Cc) Miftak'e ^ fern) propagate their likenefs. * not all the ('timein which ' the Propheu lay with dying pangs upon them (for that's far more than three dayes ~ ) for that for which they lye dead, But happily I may hereafter acquaint thee with fuch a moment of their fatal blow,(after which dierc appeared no more hope for them in the world) that may feem very probable to theejFrom that time might'ft thou call them ftark dead,all hopes being then cut off j whereas while anyhopc Iaftcd thou could'ft not fay they were Dead. Thirdly, would it not be confider'd whether the • fundry preffing importunements to read this Book (be- ing far more than to any book in the Bible) may not import that the contents of this letter do after fome pe- culiar manner concern the Ions-of men, in refpe& of - thofe advantaging difcoveries, and moft indulgent communications of our mafters picaiure, through all the ages of the Church ? the Chriftian and pious ob- fervation whereof may fortifie our refolutions againft all the black accidents we meet with in our pilgrimage; (being no other than what our Lord hath given us no- tice to expea in their appointed feries;) and conftant- ly iohcit us to a prudent watchfulneis , and hold us to our continual guard (againft any poflible furprizallin our times ) down to the great and dreadful appearance of our Deareft Lord.Examin this thing well (as thou lov ft thy foul ) Good Reader, and try if it be a fan. cy of my uwn. See , if the proemc to this facred peece rcadeth, and they that hear the words of this Prophecy, this time and keep thofe things that are written therein for (a) the henceforth time is at hand. How often is inculcated f in the fe- 'f? ^ord,5 of condand third1 Chapters) that memorable ^J? SSSgT Y"e that hath an ear to hear let him hear what the rank of events zptrtt Jatth to the Churches] even leven times ( the inthcirordcr, number of the Churches, all concein'd in it) at the end S'jfe of each Epiftle What lefs can'ft thou make of Revel. M- «- Cme'»? hither, and I will flew thee the things &c « which which fhatibe hereafter ? That lure muft needs be a ve- ry diftruftfull Soul which accounts not this invitation to extend farther than barely to S. John. Or, fuppofe, no!farther,yet was not all Scripture given for inftru&i- on?Such winning compilations we find from the mouth • every of the four proclaming * creatures ( chap. <$.) VSSwS * C0me wM&l And that none may at any time Saviours own think bimfelf unconcern'd, look Revel. 13.9: If any invitinglan- man have an ear to hear let him hear. After all this , guage John 1. begin to think with thy felf, whether it may not be 39- one of the (aJ Devills principal ftratagems , to deterr (d) Sjhtrte If the Christians ( as we ufually fee } from ve nturing on it be not the this book, and to reprelent it as a lort of high prelump- Devils me- tjon j f0 much as to take a Text from it , being drcft ey°to°caft ioraeali over in riddles' 'Tis true indeed our Lord Pleas'd veil of pre- to fpeak there in prophetical Schemes and Allegories, judiceupon which ('tis probable) were once "no lei's familiar and fuch Scrip- ufual t0 the Nations of the Orient, than our Poetical She moft Schemes and Pidures are to us at this day. This is advantagious certain , that a wary obferving the Prophetical dircoverics to language , and emblematical manner of fpeakings in the Church > the Old Teftament, is a moft unconceivable advantage ThC wel?18 t0 d^uc^da"on vifions, whereby it may knownfthanksfeem that fuch types as thofe were Anciently very fre- to that Oracle quent , and of eafy apprehenfion to the (b) Eaftejn Mr. Mede, no other man, I think , ever difcernjng it) If. 1. i. by muddying whereof, he ftruck the chief ftroke to the Jewes overfeeing the Mefliah, which had they cleerly underftood, it had led them down moft infallibly to expeft his chiefeft convention and rriniftery in Galilet. Whereas their want of intelli- gence in this paffage of Jf. turn'd it into their chiefeft fnare, wanting ( as they mifprefum'd) divine warrant for his abode thete, fo that it became their flume blingublock, Doth a ny Prophet arife out of Galilee} Nay > and that to good Na- thaniel himfelf, John 1.46. Doth any good thing come out of Nazareth ? being a City of Galilee. For fo grofs a mift had the Dcceiver thrown on that Text ( and confequcntly fo aliene an interpretation)that S.Matth.being carried by the Ho- ly Spirit to refer ffor this purpofe/ to that place, was fain to leave out the Devils trumpery with which the Septuagint was choak'd in the E vangelifts dayes, and fo ftill remains} compare,Mattb. 4.1 j. with If. 1. (b) Such Symbolical fpeech wc find in Indian> ofjjftim, and Ptrfian monuments ftill extant among us. Countryes; ( 51 ) Countryes; Nay, who can lay hut the primitive times had Apoftolical expofitions ( commended to choicer hands) to untie the more relerv'd perplexities of Scripture ? One thing I can tell thee , that many wile men have conceiv'd Saint Paul's words to Tim. 2. epifi. 1. chap. 14. verfe' , of the good depofitum com- mitted to him , to imply fome luch matter. Then tell melerioufly, fhall we therefore negle& our Lords moft deer and Iweet letter ( and one of lb much admirable and ufeful importance to our ielves ) becaufe he hath veild it with fuch a dialed as may prove an inftigatlon to our induftry ? And why wi/t thou fo wrong our ma- tter as to intitle upon him a meffage of his commands to us, which yet can no poflible way be in our times - underftood; elpecially after fo familiar a key as he hath been pleas'd to afford us [Revel. 17) by which if well regarded, and us'd to the beft advantage , we may ( irt a good meafure )open the reft of the iecret ?-Which Ch. whoever {hall anfwer to be alfo allegorical, muft give me leave to tell him-that he appears little better than a mad man (if not a blafphemerof our Lord) who will yenture to fay , when the Angel undertakes the part of an interpreter, verfe 71 that luch words alfo are Enigmatical. If to tell the my fiery, be not to fpeak in plain termes, and make a darkdr matter deer, wc muft never expe6t to underftand £nglijk while we breath. Again, what poffible ufe could there be of that di- vine outcry, Revel, 18. 4! Come out ofher (i, :e. Baby- lon } 0 my people, ( which yetnone can defty to be an infinit favour) if it could in no wile be learnt where that Babylon fhould be ? O therefore take we heed <*) Jf opt", (Deer Reader) left we injure the facet ingenuity of^Jfurctobc the Lamb who was flayn, and bach open'd that fealed*>7j$ chrift Book for our fake, Revel, 5. 9." [ a ] who therefore that holds the holds it forth to us,no longer in a fealed,but an * open Book > ^ "g form, Revel. 10. 8. and fends forth ftrait'eharge that [^ thenceforth .t ftiould be feal'dnomore , Rev, 22.10. <50 . yea,and at the drawing up quickens our regard towards it, with the fame motive he had us'd in the beginning Bleffed is he that keeps the payings of this Booi^ , Rev1 22. 7. As before , Bleffed is he that reads, frc. But who can be bleffed in reading,or who can poflibly keep what he cannot underhand ? Reading without undcr- fianding was never any way to bleffednefs. But of that Day and hour knoweth no man , no not the tAngels, neither the Son, but the Father, (JMark. 13.32. Ideftretp feem no other wife than fcepticai in all thefe difficulties.But I pray confer with Rev. 5.9. Where our Bleffed Lord opens the fealed Book , and the worthinefs to open it,is attributed to his being ftain, [ Thost art worthy, &c. for thou wafi flam.] The Son himfelf (as man) before his Paffion ( we may lpeak't with a holy Reverence) had not this myftery revealed to him ; 'Twas onely (as yet) in the Fathers han^s, jitts 1.7. The Son at this time-unflain, unglorified.f The Book was as yet a fealed one ( arifwerabie to Da. 12.4. 9.) But the Captain of our falvation (who was made pe»fe& through fufferings,Heb. 2. 9, 10.) hath now both; unfeal'd it,and Commanded it for ever to abide fo, Revel. 22. iq. So that may.we not now think (as the Apoftle feemes to intimate, 1 Thef. 5. 4. & 5. ) that if that Day doe overtake any as a Theef in the night , ( though this alio ufeth to be another obje&ion)they'r onlyluchas are in darknefs, andnot tbe Children of the'slight ?'Twill ( indeed) appear as the flood in the dayes of Noah, finding men eating, drinking , &c. Matth. 24. 37. But neither doth that Text implie the want of all light in the fa- cred Oracles whereby we may be guided into this ex- pectation, but rather the hardnefs of mens hearts, as it was in the dayes of Noah>; when (fure) his fo long continuance in the building an Ark might have been convi^ion fufficient to any (but men before drown'd in fecurity ) that the Flood was coming. Might not. every (S3) every ftroke upon that fignal Fabrfck have proov'd a Sermon of repentance to ingenuous minds ? Confult with that place of St.*?eter ,and fee if upon this very fcore it call not holy Noah the Preacher of rightecuf- nefs. 2 Pet. 2. 5. To which purpofe alfo may that other more obfeure paffage of the fame Apoftle be urg'd far more fenfibly ( Irrow) than it is wont to ferve for Purgatory , 1 Vet. 3. 19, 20. Namely that Chrift by his Spirit preacht (in the Minift'ry of Noah,)f' to thofe rebellious mifcreants, of fo narrow and con- fin'd Spirits, that they allow'd not themfelvesfo much liberty of reafon, and freedom of difcourle,as to colled that the threaten'd Flood muft needs be approaching , though they faw an Arkfo long in rearing. Anfwer me (Reader) doth not [the long fuftering of God, waiting in the days of Noah , while the Ark was preparing J mention'd by St. Peter, produce this refult, That they in the days otNoah obtain'd a very mcrcifull premo- Gen g y nition , in which they might have read the intentions hisdayjfhaibe of his vengeance upon thofe times , had not their ob- an hundred & ftinate relu6tancies rendred thofe lweet opportunities twemy years, ineffeaual to themfelves ? And if the State of "the J^f0*" World at his fecond coming be as it was then, ( as fo ded^nay^Hi we hear it muft)dbth it not imply the Indulgence of our by our Sy- Lord in gracious forewarnings, but our own defeaive- noc|e-Notes nefs in their obfervation ? too) of Gods Who ever ( after all this) fhall think this fpecula- S tion of time a needlefs curiofity,Iet him remember how the Deluge, our Saviour reproov'd the Jewes for neglea hereof, Lu^e 12. $6. 0 yee Hypocrites, yee can difcern the face of the skjefiut how is a that yee do not difcern this time }viz,. thatthis isthe very age in which the Mef- fiah is to be born. And that this was our Holy Saviour's meaning appears by that other famous paffage of his recorded by the fame St. Luke ch. 4.Where curdeereft Jefus;inmeerdefign to point at Daniels Weeks,(which led down to him) by the identity of the phrafe,takcsa H 3 Text C$4) Text from I fay t- He bath annointed me to preach the CjojpeL Luke 4/18. From whence he raifeth this fo uletull do&rin, ( had not his heareis been unimagina- bly .ftupid ) Thus Day if this Scrip: ufe fbifid tn your ears, verfe 21. But why ( I pray )^This Scripture , and this D y ? Why ? txk in Darnel, and you will eafily fee the reafon %*J)ar\ iz. 24. Seventy weekj, &c. And to anoint the rhofi holy. q. d..The ap- pointed time leading to me is now expir'd , This Day is this Scrip ure fulfild in your eares , The Sptrii hath anointedme -- How is it therefore Q yee (^N-otejThis Hypocrites that yee do not difcern this time? The every one of us from the danger of the the world,'butlike exl ofluiation,How is it, &c. Since the Epocha, our Lord with guiding us in the %evel\tion to his fecond coming , is all the circum- far more deerly expreft than that which led tohisfot- ftai!TSandhUo.mer 111 Dan'el > Lec any one wci8h ' [ 4nd whence veityy,' which" Oregon fant he was cafl unto the Earth , &c.) with jggravati- !J [ Seventy weekj are determind upon thy people and upon onsno que- thy holy City ] Their [fVHE N] from whence they D^vil^made vvere t0 rec^on» feemes t0 he but obfeurely impli'd, ufcoftoapply ours cleeriy exPrcft ' and yet they were call'd Hypo- iRedtunt Sa~ crites, Sec. And (hall not we ? God grant we be not. tuma ngtt*] to I will prefent but one fuggeftion more to this con- the merry fideration, and take leave. Is it not probable that tho foThe3defpN iubcil old Serpent, about the times in which Chrift fed Infant, be- was to be born (of which he was able enough to make ing affifted to colle&ion from Daniels Weeks) perceiving the Na«^ this fuggeftion tions(as I told thee) partly from rDantcl, and partly leSal Mo-from the Sibls fcatterd Predi^i°ns > to be Jul 1 of the narchy, by the expe&arion of fome admirable change , thruft in that vain hope marvellous peece of impofture about Salonita, Pollio's whereof he ^ Son, born fmiling , purpolely to become the fubje& ih?world for on whom thole glorious Elogies of happy mutation, this after-im- might be fixt, (a) as his exceeding remarkable manner predion. of coming into the world ( fo quite contrary to all 0* (ther births) might very fignifkantly portend, in defign (s 5) co div«rt that age from pitching their eyes on the holy Infant Jefus? fid. £log, 4. Virgil. But wilt thou not marvail if I fliew thee that the Devill ( being loath to ufe any other method than what formerly fucceeded foprofperoufly) feeing,(doubtlefs) that his fecond co- ming is neer approaching, hath laid the fame fnare to divert our Nation from ejcpe&ing this mannfc* of his appearance, by tempting.one Ari[e Evans {z man ve- ry exemplary in having predicted divers things which have anlwerably fuccaeded, and coniequently, authen- rick enough to be his inftrument in fuch a fnare ) to fatten feveral prefages concerning the fate of the for- mer King (of pious memory) all which obteind effeft, and the reftitution of this his fon, upon many paffages of Scripture that evidently concern this matter, as thou wilt eafily acknowledge ( Reader) if in his Book intitled A voice from Heaven , where thou wilt- find great variety from the Bible (belonging to this my- ftery.) applied to our ftate of things partly in what is paft , partly in what he incourageth us to expe& in England ? In a word, All the glorious promifes meant in Scripture of our Lord, he applyes to the King of England (calling him as I remember the root of Jeffe) and in exprefs termes bids them that expe& Chrifts per- fonal reign, to look for the accomplilhment of thofe promifes in that lpeculation he acquaints us with about our K. Charles , made by him to be the King that (hall rule in righteoufnes,yea and that man by whom God will Judge the World. V. pi. Confider it Reader, and the Lojd direft thee. rh (5*) The Holy Trinity , to whom be e- verlajling honour 0be pleas'd to open our hearts and eyes to the difcerning this myjlery9 and the time leading down unto it. Amen. The / (57) TheRequeftofthe Author to his Fellow-Bre- thren5imploring their fatisfa&ion in thole fol- lowing confiderations. I, Pi Ince by the principles of this Difcourfe the fore- ^^ mention d CM.]fiery (commencing at our Blef- fed Saviours coming ) begins with RomeV %#ine , ( for if She be Babylon, her fall ( as to the City ) is affixt to the very hour of the Witneffes rijing, being the complete term of the 1260. Dayes,Revel.11. '13.) Whether it be altogether unworthy of our attention to obferve how full the world ts at this very day of expe- ctation of that Long d-for Overthrow , in Jo much that Divers mouths and pens ( without any reference at all to the Apocalyps) have publifht their judgements of that incomparable cDefolation likely to be before i6$6. paffc over us. Nay more, Is it of no moment that the Diffo- itttionofthe Turkifh Empire {the Apocalyptical Eu- phrates) is aimd at by Gaffarel about Anno 1655? Really , fuch prognofiications are wont to affeti me as little as moft men (/ perfwade my felf) breathing j but in thii cafe , where the matter feems fo cleerly pointed nt by the facred ^Authority of the Apocalyps, ( efpe- tially their proofs being of a different nature from mine9 jet pitching on the fame term,) I could not but prefent this humble expoftulation. 2. Whether the Holy Spirit feem not to have ( af- y . ter fome peculiar way ) determined the badge of the I^cZuV Witneffes-flaughter to be loo^'t after in Britain rather j * ' than any other parts of the Reformation j and that for ' theje Reafons„ Firft ythe words , Revel, n.8. Which »1 • «,« m mder In the ftreet, will very Naturally fignify, In \ "s all will the Latitude ( coming from a*«7of, as every School-boy grant) is here knows ) In the Ou£?C read 10, to p. 15. ftore I ufe read ftorehoufc. FINIS,