KNOWS UNTO YOU THE POWER AND COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, BUT " WE H IVE NOT FOLLOWED CUNNINGLY DEVISED FABLES, WHEN WE MYDB WERE EYE-WITNESSES OF HIS MAJESTY WHEN WE WERE WITH HIM IN THE HOLY M(1L'NT." No, 22, WHOLE No THE ADVENT HERALD IS PUBLISHED EVERY SATURDAY AT NO. 8 CHARDON-STREET, BOSTON, BY J. V. HIMES. TERMS.-«1 Per Volum^ of Twenty-six Numbers. 85 for Six copies. MO for Thirteen conies, in advanct. Single "copy, 5 cts. wiffjv'Hl&gaT'11' ren»ittanceB'for tt,ia office, should be directed to J V. HIMES, Boston, Mass. (postpaid,. Subscribers' names, with their Post-odice address, should be distinctly given when money is forwarded. s vc" Hope and Heaven, BY REV. M. VICARY. There is a bark unseen in which we glide Above the billows of life's stormy sea, As buoyant as the sea-bird on the tide- Though dangers thicken round, from fear as free. The winds may freshen, and the lightnings play, At midnight streaming on the briny deck, i et in this airy bark we speed away, Certain of port secure from rock and wreck. She laughs at th' elemental war, and the wild wave Uashes itself against the prow in vain ; A hand directs the helm that welf can save, And bid be hushed each doubting fear again. There is a land, a fair and happy land, W here all are welcome on her friendly coast; No surges briiiik upon that sunny strand. Hut each dark care iu pleasure pure is lost. There sorrow's fountain pours no crystal store— <*rief has no sigh, the heart no gnawing pain- l ne mind no torture, and the eye weeps no more; i here smiles the captive o'er his broken chain. Such is the clime we seek, and such the soil: Kir it, from home all willingly we're driven ; fauide us, thou friendly star! breathe, gentle gale! *or that fair bark is hope-that land is heaven ! Dublin University Magazine his name, God with us. Butter and honey shall he eat; (a common article of food in the East at the present day ;) by his knowledge he shall refuse the evil and choose the good* For, before the child shall know to refuse the evil and choose the^good, the land that thou pollutest, shall be forsaken of both her kings " Isa. 7:14-16. If it be asked, Why the prophet should merely say that the destruction of the kingdom of Israel should take place before the promised Child could distinguish between good and evil, when this event was to happen seve- ral centuries before this period; I believe the only answer that can be given is, that it did not seem good unto God that the precise time The Work pf the Messiah. BY RIDLEY H. HERSCHELL, PASTOR OF A CHURCH OF CONVERTED JEWS IN LONDON, ENG. (Continued from our last.) THE next vision of Isaiah begins with the seventh chapter, and ends with the twelfth; the work to be accomplished by the Messiah being the chief subject of it. It begins, as usual, with trouble and confusion ; and ends with universal order and blessedness. The difficulties and obscurities in this and in other visions, I am disposed to believe, arise from the blending the events of Ahaz' reign, with those much more remote; from the judgments and deliverances to be wrought in Israel being mixed up with those general judgments, and that redemption, to be ultimately wrought out hy the Messiah on the whole earth. To enter into a critical examination of this prophecy would far exceed my limits; lean only notice the leading features of it. Ahaz, «mg of Judah, " did not that which was right 'j1 the sight of the Lord." When he heard that the king of Syria was confederate with the king of Israel, and that they were bent on destroying the kingdom of Judah, he was greatly discouraged. His fear arose from un- belief in the promises of the God of Israel, whom he had forsaken. An ancient prophecy was recorded in the law, that the sceptre should not depart from Judah until Shiloh should J°me ; and, therefore, he ought not to have eared the overthrow of his kingdom before eve"t had taken place. God had also Promised to David that his throne should be established forever; that he should have a son, even the Messiah, of whom God said, "I will r hlm 'n niy house and in my kingdom mrever, and his throne shall be established for ^ermore." 1 Chron. 17:14. The prophet lief1 ls/ent t0 shovv Ahaz his follyand unbe" j '> and to announce to him, that so far from raei overcoming the kingdom of Judah. Is- itself should cease to be a people within e years. thp n L°rd' desirinS t0 reveal the advent of ^promised Deliverer, desires Ahaz to ask a L^foncerniqgit; which Ahaz, with a false J U1"ty, something nkin tn that nf day wf f°™ethi,>« akin t0 that of the present into th glares it presumption to inquire the fntn mean„lng of God's promises respecting himselfr€'' uses t<> do. Therefore the Lord »hal clg'VeS the s,'Sn- "Behold, a virgin c°aceive and bear a son, and shall call of the Messiah's birth should be made known to the men of that generation; even, as in the days of the apostles, the period of His second advent was not distinctly revealed, but was spoken of as if it might have been a much nearer event than history has shown it to be. The sign was given not to Ahaz as an individ- ual, but to the whole nation. It was not given Y? to thee, but DO1? to you. I do not enter into the discussion respecting this remarkable proph- ecy. The Jews themselves are deeply conscious that they have nothing satisfactory to urge against its strong evidence for the claims of Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah. According to them, it refers to Isaiah's son, or to the son of Ahaz, or to the son of they know not whom, living at that time. But when was any child of king or prophet called, "God with us?" And when did this merely human Immanuel become possessed of the land of promise, as he is stated to be in chap. 8:8? Their explanations of this passage are so various, so contradictory, and so unsatisfactory to themselves, that to en- ter upon them is a mere waste of words. In the remainder of the seventh chapter, and a large portion of the eighth, the near judg- ments upon the Jews form the chief theme ; through which, occasionally, a glimpse of the " great and terrible day of the Lord " appears. I would particularly direct the attention of my Jewish brethren to chap. 8:13-17. It has been frequently shown them by Christian au- thors, that the name Map mn\ Jehovah Tzeba- oth, the Lord of hosts, is generally applied to the Messiah—he who appeared to Joshua as " Captain of the Lord's host." In v. 14, while this Lord of hosts is declared to be a sanctuary to those who believe in Him, He is said to be " a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem." Can any words more accurately describe what the Lord Jesus Christ has been to the Jews for the last 1800 years ? Do they confess that God, the Almighty Father, has been a stone of stum- bling and rock of offence to them? And if they shrink from owning such guilt and blas- phemy as this, then who is that Lord of hosts, in rejecting whom so many of them have stum- bled, and fallen, and been broken ? In the latter portion of the eighth chapter, there is considerable obscurity in the language, any attempt to elucidate which is beside my present subject. But the translation of the first verse of chap. 9, in the authorized version, is so utterly unintelligible, that I greatly prefer the mode in which it is rendered by Dr. Hen. I believe this to be the true rendering of the pas- sage, which is obscured by making his eating butter and honey appear as the cause of his knowing to re- tuse the evil and choose the good. The words are precisely similar to those in Isa. 53 : "By his know- ledge shall my righteous servant justify many " I am also disposed to think that the mention of butter and honey is used to signify a low and poor condition This article is much used by the poorer classes in byria at the present day; and in the latter part of this chapter it is mentioned as the food of the land when in a desolate and impoverished condition. derson.But darkness shall not remain, where once was distress; as formerly he rendered con- temptible the land of Zebulon and the land of Napthali, so he shall afterwards confer honor upon them—the tract by the sea, the region beyond Jordan, Galilee of the nations." The verb here translated " rendered contemptible " —"lightly afflict," in the authorized version— is the same used in Deut. 27:16: "Cursed is he that set.leth light by, [despiseth, or contemn- eth,] his ather or his mother." And the verb, as translated.above, "confer honor upon," and in the authorized version, "did more grievous- ly afflict," is the one used in Jer. 30:19: "I will also glorify them." This rendering, which I believe to be the true one, connects the first verse of the ninth chapter with the second; while the authorized translation has no connection either with what precedes or fol- lows it. I think a careful study of this vision may be of great use to the student of prophecy, in aiding him to understand the arrangement and meaning of many subsequent prophecies. The ninth chapter commences with the light shining on dark and despised Galilee, through the birth of the Child, who was to be called, " Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the Everlasting Father, [or Father of the everlast- ing age,] the Prince of Peace." The conse- quences 'of ihe birth of this Child were to be, that those who formerly walked in darkness should see a great light; that the yoke of Is- rael's burden, and the rod of his oppressor should be broken ; on which account there should be universal rejoicing in the nation. It is further stated, that of the " increase and the peacefulness of his government there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from hence- forth, even forever." After this general state- ment of the subject, the prophet,is again led in vision to contemplate the more immediate calamities of Israel; these occupy him chiefly unto the end of the tenth chapter. With these nearer visitations, however, it is very evident that the exploits of some final adversary of Is- rael are intermingled; as there are several things stated of the " Assyrian " in this chap- ter that were not true of Sennacherib. Imme- diately after stating the overthrow of this As- syrian, the prophet returns to the glory of the latter days, the peace and blessedness of Mes- siah's reign. In the eleventh chapter there are several direct and explicit statements made of what the Messiah was to perform. He is to stand as an ensign to the nations, (vs. 10, 12,) and " stretch out his hand the second time to recover the remnant, of his people," to " assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth." To explain this of the return from Babylon is too palpably absurd to deserve a serious refutation. Is restoring them from one given locality, gathering them toge ther from the four corners of the earth ? But into this subject I will enter more fully when we come to the prophecies of Jeremiah. The vision concludes with the Israelites song of triumph on their final deliverance, achieved by the Messiah, when God's anger is turned away from them, and He comforts them; when the Jewish nation,* personified, as in other parts of this prophecy, as a female, is called upon to rejoice, " Cry out and shout, thou inhabitress of Zion, for great is the Holy One of Israel in the midst of thee." She has been " as a woman forsaken and grieved in spi- rit," but now she is again established on her own holy mountain ; and again cheered by that We think the term Israel would be preferable here, to that of " Jewish nation."—Ed. Divine presence, which, as Moses averred, dis- tinguished her from all other people : " Great is the Holy One of Israel in the midst of her." The termination of this vision is exactly the same as that of the previous vision in chap. 4. " The Lord fwill create upon every dwelling- place of Mount Zion, and upon her assemblies, a cloud and smoke by day, and the shining of a flaming fire by night; for upon all the glory shall be a defence." Were it not that the system of making words say something quite different from their obvious meaning, falsely called spiritualizing, is a solvent that can melt down the plainest truths, the latter part of t'lis vision would be sufficient to convince any one that the prophets viewed the first and second advents of the Messiah as one great event, and therefore pre- sented the features of these separate events in- terwoven together. That the " Child born " and the " Son given," refers to the Messiah's first advent, no Christian disputes ; but what the breaking of Israel's burden, and " the staff of his shoulder, and the rod of his oppressor, as in the day of Midian, with burning and fuel of fire," has to do with the first coming of Christ in meekness and humility, it would puzzle the most inveterate spiritualizer to give any plausible account of. In like manner, in chap. 11 the Messiah is represented as a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a branch out of his roots; on whom the seven-fold gift of the Spirit was to rest. This, again, is universally conceded to be true of His first coming. Some- thing parallel to what is stated in the following verses may also be found in the actings of his first advent; He was of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord ; He did not judge after the sight of His eyes, nor reprove after the hearing of His ears. But during all His life upon earth, what was there analogous to the following statement: " He shall smite the earth with the rod of His mouth, and with the breath of His lips shall He slay the wicked?" And were the results of His first advent, that the wolf and the lamb should dwell together, that none should hurt nor destroy in all God's holy mountain, and that the earth should be full of the knowledge of the Lord ? To go through all the visions of Isaiah, pointing out the work of the Messiah in each, would be to write a lengthened commentary on his prophecies, which is not my intention. I believe that what I have said will be a help to the student of prophecy, in directing his atten- tion to the harmony of the Divine predictions. I think he may trace the order I have stated in most of the subsequent prophecies; not only in those of Isaiah, but in the visions of the other prophets. The two grand divisions of the great and terrible day of the Lord, and the glory of the latter days, may be distinctly per- ceived ; and it frequently happens, as in the case of the vision we have been considering, that after mentioning these two subjects in the usual order, the prophet returns to the nearer visitations upon the Jews, with which he in- termingles the more terrible features of " the great day." With these few hints to guide them, let my readers examine for themselves the visions contained in chap. 24-26; 29; 33- 35; and in certain portions of other chapters they will find the same events more briefly hinted at. The 49th chapter of Isaiah is too remarka- ble to be passed over without a special notice. All attempts to apply it to Isaiah, or Cyrus, or the Jewish nation, or the prophets as a body, can be considered little better than mere eva- sions of the claims of Jesus of Nazareth to be the Messiah. That some, so-called Christian commentators, have adopted these evasions of the Rabbins, adds nothing to their force. What 170 THE ADVENT* HERALD. commission bad Isaiah or Cyrus to enlighten the Gentiles ? But the Jewish nation had this commission, say those who espouse this inter- pretation.* Was the Jewish nation, then, the appointed instrument to bring itself again to God, to gather itself, and to raise itself up ? and was it the Jewish nation that, after using its utmost endeavors to accomplish its own good, lamented that it had " labored in vain, and spent its.strength for nought?" Into such or similar absurdities, does every interpretation run, that attempts to apply the predictions of this chapter to any but the Messiah. I can only afford space to notice one act of the Messiah stated in this chapter. " Thus saith the Lord, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee; and I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate herit- ages." Isa. 49:8. The Messiah is not to burn up and destroy the earth, but to establish it; D'pn, to raise it up, restore it from the effects of the fall. The commonly received notion of the entire destruction of the earth, and the re- moval of the righteous to dwell, in some un- known region, derives no countenance from Scripture. The apparent confirmation from Peter's statement, that " the earth and the works that are therein shall be burnt up," is explained and modified by the way in which he speaks of this earth previous to the flood : " The world that then was being overflowed with water, perished." This plainly intimates, that in speaking of the successive changes that take place on this earthj he does not contem- plate its destruction in the mode in which this is generally understood; but that the ''new- earth " is related to the existing world in the same way as " the world that then was," is related to it. The prophet Isaiah has elsewhere borne the same testimony to the stability of the earth; " Thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God Himself that formed the earth and made it; He hath established it, He cre- ated it not in vain, Be formed it to be inhabit- ed; I am tbe Lord, and there is none else." Isa. 45:18. How can this be true, if God ere ated it to be burnt up and destroyed ? No ; the renovating work of Messiah is not confined merely to the soul of man, but extends also to bis body and his habitation.—To be continued.) Tbe Congregation of the Dead, BY RKV. JOHN CUMM1NG, D. D>, (Concluded,) Then you may ask (and surely, if you have any interest in your own safety, you must ask- earnestly)—" What is it to be in Christ?" The language, my dear friends, is- most expressive If I am to describe it generally, I would say it is to look for salvation through his blood alone to feel that if God were to sink me to the depths of everlasting ruin, He would not pronounce upon me a sentence greater or more severe than I have deserved, and yet to feel that if, in tbe name and through the righteous ness of Christ, He were to raise me to a glory too brilliant for nsiortal eye to lpok on, and too magnificent for the human mind to conceive God would not bestow upon me a boon greater than Christ's merits entitle me to. To be in Christ, if I may paraphrase it, is to feel that Christ paid all we owed to God, and purchased for us far more than God owed to us—that He is our only way to know God, and the only way for God to receive us—that He is the only channel for us to reach God, or for God to come down to; it is to feel that Christ's sacrifice is the only expiatory sacrifice for sin, and that it is not only access to God, provided by Infinite Wisdom, but that it is the very expression and evidence of God's love to us. Our Saviour is precious, not simply as making it possible for God to forgive us, (just as it is made possible , for the Queen of England to forgive the sen- tence of a convict, and to remit it,) but, inas- much as he shows that God will not merely forgive us, and leave us to live the lives of for- given convicts, at a distance, but that he will take us to his bosom as justified, and redeemed, and converted, and adopted sons. The expression " in Christ" is a very peculiar one ; and I am quite sure that you may see, by the simple contrast which I will make, that it is not an ordinary expression denoting merely, as some think, that we are to follow Christ. We do not say a pupil is in his teacher, a pa- tient in his physician, a son in his father, or a servant in his master ; we say the pupil follows his teacher, the patient follows his physician, the son obeys his father, the servant serves his master. Then if this peculiar expression " in Christ" is constantly employed in Scripture, if the ordinary phraseology of life is designedly outraged by a strange and uncouth expression of relationship, are we not warranted in infer- ring that there is some great reason for this change, something more in it than the Socinian means by following Christ ? The Scriptures generally employ plain language ; and, when strange expressions are used, it is to describe a doctrine that is strange, or far above the routine of mere humanity. It is, in short, one of a series of phrases allusive, I believe, to known and expressive symbols. I find that all in the ark were saved, while all out of it were lost. What would have been the use of any antedi- luvian sinner, a strong swimmer, determining to follow, but not to enter the ark ? He might swim for a few hours, but it would not be long before he sank. Now an antediluvian sinner following the ark by swimming, in order to escape drowning, is just like a Socinian sinner trying to be saved from wrath by merely fol- lowing Christ. The allusion may be to the city of refuge. The manslayer,'outside, might be smitten down and destroyed, but the moment h6 got inside he was safe ; while the criminal pursued by the avenger of blood was rushing to the city of refuge, if he was caught on his way to it he would be slain; but the instant he got into it he wrould be safe. Thus following Christ is not enough ; you must be in Christ, as the criminal was in the city of refuge, as Noah and his family were in the ark; and then the winds may blow and the waters may rise, or the avenger may pursue, but " there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus." My dear friends, are you in this state ? Are you not merely believers in Christ as a teacher, but " in Christ " as your glorious sacrifice, your eternal refuge, your priest,your altar, your all? Are you connected with him as the branch is connected with the vine—united to him, incor- porated with him, one with him, in life, in death, and in eternity ? Union with Christ is not a mere figure of speech—it is not a metaphor —it is a reality ; so much so, that whatever I do ieen the subject of his doubts. That vision appeared unto DANIEL in the third year (8:1) of the reign of BELSIIAZZAR—the NABONADIUS of PTOLEMY'S Canon. Fifteen years subsequent to this, " BELSHAZZAR king of the Chal- deans was slain ; and DARIUS the Median took the kingdom" (5 : 30, 3r>. With the death of the Baby- lonian monarch terminated the seventy years, JERE- MIAH had prophesied, that the Jews should serve the king of Babylon. (Jer. 25 : 11.) In the first year of DARIUS, the year of the termination of this period, DANIEL understood by the sacred books, that the death of BELSHAZZAR completed " the number of the years whereof the word of the LORD came to JERE- MIAH the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem "(9:2). As the seventy years were thus fulfilled, DANIEL must have supposed that the period during which the " sanctuary and the host" were " to be trodden un- der foot," had also terminated; for in his prayer he evidently blends together the treading down of the sanctuary, and the desolations of Jerusalem. Ac- cordingly he says: " I set my face unto the LORD GOD, to seek by prayer and supplications, with fast- ing, and sackcloth, and ashes" (v. 3). He then specifies the sins of the Jewish nation, and as a con- sequence, instances the punishments which GOD had inflicted on Jerusalem as a confirmation of the words he had spoken against them.—v. 12. He then most fervently prays that GOD will let his " anger and fury bo turned away" from " Jerusalem," the " holy mountain," cause his face to shine upon his " sanc- tuary " that was " desolate," and behold the " city " which was called by his name.—vs. 16-18. Thus he prayed for the accomplishment of the very events which were to transpire at the end of the 2300 days, according to the previous vision. That vision GA- BRIEL had been commanded to make DANIEL under- stand (8.16); and yet there was something respect- ing it that DANIEL confesses he did not understand— v. 27. When in his prayer he thus blended together the fulfilment of the seventy years with the events of the vision that GABRIEL had failed to give him a full understanding of, that angel was again commissioned to hasten to his aid. DANIEL says: " While I was speaking, and praying, and confessing my sin, and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my sup- plication before the LORD my GOD, for ihe holy moun- tain of my GOD "—showing that that was what he understood to be denoted by the sanctuary that was to be trodden under foot—; " yea, while I was speak- ing in prayer, even the man GABRIEL, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning "—in the preced- ing vision, which GABRIEL had endeavored to make DANIEL understand—; " being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation ; and he informed me"—of that in the vision respect- ing which the prophet was before mistaken—; " and talked with me, and said, O DANIEL, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding''''—of what he had betore been commanded.—" At the be- ginning of thy supplications the commandment"— to give the instruction which he had before failed to do—" came forth, and I am come to show thee "— something respecting which DANIEL was in want of, — "for thou art greatly beloved : therefore understand the matter,"—of which he wa3 in doubt—" and consider the vision," which he had be- fore been commissioned to explain to.hirn.—9:20-23. That " the vision," of which the above was the sub- ject, was the vision of the 8th chapter, it is so evi- dent, that we cannot escape the conclusion. The angel then proceeds to inform DANIEL that ' seventy weeks," or 490 days, " are determined upon " his people for certain specified objects, among which are the re-building of the city and the wall, and the coming of the MESSIAH ; that in the midst of the last week of the 490 days, the MESSIAH should cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, that af- ter that the city and sanctuary should be destroyed, and be desolate until the consummation of the vision, —vs. 24-27. This additional information would give DANIEL no more understanding of the preceding vision, unless the 70 weeks were part of the 2300 days. All good Hebrew and Chaldee scholars in- form us that the word "|nn, rendered " determined," is literally, "cut off."* This confirms theconclu * On this word Professor WHITING has the following note:— " ' Cleansed.'njJzfJoA, the niphal or passive form oftheverb tzadak, to be right, just, Anal. Chron. vol. II. p. 564. sion, that this shorter period of 70 weeks commence with, and were to be " cut off" from the 2300 days. If so, it follows that the 2300 days, with the 70 weeks, commence with " the going forth of the de- cree to restore and to re-build Jerusalem." And, consequently, if we could find when the 70 weeks terminated, we should know that the 2300 prophetic days—years—commenced 490 years previously, and would have from that termination but (2300-1-490) 1810 years to be subsequently fulfilled. All Protestant commentators terminate the 70 weeks in close connection with the crucifixion. The majority of them suppose they extend only to the crucifixion. Some very respectable writers, however, hold that the crucifixion marked the middle of the last week,—the point when the sacrifice and oblation were to cease. If this opinion is well founded, it follows that the 2300 days would terminate 1813 1-2 years subsequent to the crucifixion. The crucifixion is generally assigned to A. D. 33.—Thus FERGUSSON, Archbishop USHER, and others. Their argument is based on astronomical data respecting the year when the first full moon after the vernal equinox could occur on Friday. But Dr. HALES, the most learned modern chronologist, entirely explodes the premises on which this argument is based. He shows that the apparent time which the Jews observed, might vary from the astronomical time a day either way, (New Anal Chron. vol. 1, p. 174,) so that there would be no absolute certainty in the astronomical argument; and farther, that argument adopts the modern mode of Jewish computation, while FABER (vol. 1. pp.12-14) shows that the Caraite reckoning, which is one moon later than the Rabbinical, was the ancient one, and brought the passover in connection with the barley harvest, a sheaf of the first fruits of which was always waved by the priest before the LORD for a wave offering. Thus they show the fallacy of the argu ment of FERGUSON, USHER, and others. Dr. HALES adopts A. D. 31 as the year of the crucifixion. With that date the 2300 days would end in the fall of 44; but no event then occurred sufficiently important to warrant such a conclusion. Sir ISAAC NEWTON places the crucifixion in A. D. 34, and Dr. JARVIS in A. D. 29 ; but after the falsity of the premises which assigns it to A. D. 33 is shown, we sie not how any year can be fixed on with absolute certainty, as the year of that event. We know, indeed, that it must have oc- curred within a cricle of a very few years, but cannot assert which. As the circle for that event is limited, so is the cir- cle limited, in accordance with the foregoing reason- ing, within which the 2300 years must terminate. Making all reasonable allowance for discrepancies in the records of chronology, we have already reached the farthest verge, according to our conceptions, of their prescribed limits. If they are admitted^ to ex- tend much in the future, they must be entirely discon- nected from the 70 weeks in their commencement, or the date for the crucifixion must be removed without the limits of all reasonable chronological argument. The latter we cannot do, and to admit the former would be to concede, not only a most strongly fortified position, but one of the chief evidences of our present latitude and longitude. We have been firmly per- suaded that this period would extend to the actual coming of CHRIST ; but as his coming is delayed, we are led to enquire if some lesser event, a longer or shorter time to precede his coming, may not mark their fulfilment. Bro. LITCH and others have thus * On this phrase, Prof. WHITING remarks as fol- lows:—"The verb -]nn (chathah)—(in the niphal form, passive, —nechtak), is found only in Dan. 9:24. Not another instance of its use can be traced in the entire Hebrew Testament, As Chaldaic and Rabbinical usage must give us the true sense of the word; if we are guided by these, it has the single signification of cutting, cutting off. In the Chaldeo- Rabbinic Dictionary of Stockius, the word "]nn cha- thah is thus defined :—' Scidit, abscidit, conscidit, inscidit,excidit'—To cut, to cut away, to cutin pieces, to cut or engrave, to cut off. " Mercerus, in his ' Thesaurus,' furnishes a speci- men of Rabbinical usage in the phrase IBOSB' riDTIH (chathikah shelbasar)—a piece of flesh,' or, ' a cut of flesh.' He translates the word as it occurs in Dan. 9:24, by " praecisa est '—was cut off. " In the literal version of Arias Montanus, it is translated 1 decisa est'—was cut off. In the mar- ginal reading, which is grammatically correct, it is rendered by the plural, ' decisae sunt'—were cut off. In the Latin version of Junius and Tremellius, nech- tak is reudered ' decisae sunt'—were cut off. " Again, in Theodotion's Greek version of Dan- iel, (which is the version used in the Vatican copy of the Septuagint as being the most faithful,) it is ren- dered by , rendered SA- VIOUR, when applied to JESUS, is so pregnant and comprehensive, that the Latin tongue had no single word able to express it, till long after the time of CICERO. And the Christians in the Latin Church were a long time at a loss what word to use for it.— When applied to CHRIST, it is in the sublime and pe- culiar manner, to denote that " neither is there salva- tion in any other; for there is none other NAME uu- der heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved" (Acts 4:12.) " He bare our sins in his own body on the tree;" (1 Pet. 2:24;) and so in Him " we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins." (Col. 1:14.) Thus GOD was in CHRIST reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them." (2 Cor. 5: 19.) He is, therefore, a SAVIOUR in the most exalt- ed sense; so that he was rightly called " a PRINCE and a SAVIOUR "—(Acts 5:31)—the " one MEDIATOR between GOD and man, the man CHRIST JESUS." (1 Tim. 2:5.) The word CHRIST (^pio-ro?") signifies the same in the Greek, that MESSIAS [ITCD] does in the Hebrew, and both of them signify the Anointed. Such a BE- ING the Jews of old fully expected : even the woman of Samaria saith, "I know that MESSIAS cometh" (John 4:25); and we find " all men musing in their hearts of JOHN, whether he were the CHRIST or not'' (Luke 3:15). Yet the Jews overlooked him in his low- estate; for " being in the form of GOD, he thought it not robbery to be equal with GOD ; yet he made him- self of no reputation, and took upon him the form of servant." (Phil. 2:6, 7.) Because he said, "I and my Father are one," the Jews took up stones to stone Hint for blasphemy; for, said they, "thou, being a man, makest thyself GOD." (John 10:30:33.) Christ says of himself," Before Abraham wasl am." (John 8:58.) PAUL says, that " by him were all things created that are in heaven above, and that are in earth, visible and invisible ... all things were cre- ated by him and for hint: and he is before all things, and by him all things consist." (Col. 1:16, 17.)— * It is worthy of notice, that the apostles invaria- bly apply to Christ the Greek word x-vpiof, translated Lord, which is the very word that occurs in the Sep- tuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, in common use by the Jews in that day, to denote mrr, JEHOVAH. Thus, when God says, "I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of GOD ALMIGHTY, but by my name JEHOVAH [mrr] was I not known unto them," (Ex. 6:3,) it is rendered in the Greek Septuagint, x-fpios. Christ comforteth St. John with the majesty of his title: " Fear not, I am the first and the last," which words were spoken by " one like unto the Son of Man " (Rev. 1:17); and he also saith, " I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty " (v. 8). But the Jews could not believe on Him, because, as Esaias had said, GOD had blinded their eyes, hard- ened their hearts, &c.; which " things said Esaias, when he saw his glory, and spake of Him." (John 12:41.) The glory of Christ that Isaiah saw, was in the year that Uzziah died, when he " saw the LORD [MRR, Jehovah.] sitting upon a throne high and lifted up . . . and one [seraph] cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts."— (Isa. 6:1-3 ) This was the same Christ in whom dwelt " all the fulness of the Godhead bodily." (Col. 2:9.) It is of Him that Paul testifies, when he says, " GOD was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." (1 Tim. 3:16.) And he says to tbe elders of the church of Christ at Ephesus, " Take heed unto yourselves, and to all the flock over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to teed the church of GOD which He hath purchased with his own blood "— (Acts 20:28.) Again, Paul doth magnify the Jews when he saith of them : " Out of whom as concern- ing the flesh, Christ came, who is overall, God blessed forever " (Rom. 9:5); and when Jesus spake unto Thomas, " Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God." John testifies of Him that" this is the true God, and eternal life." (1 Ep. 5:20.) And unto him the Father saith, " Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever." (Heb. 1:8.) The Fa- ther " hath committed all judgment unto the Son, that all men should honor the Son even as they hon- or the Father." (John 5:22, 23.) Thus it was pre- sented to John in vision, when he heard " every crea- ture which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, saying, Blessing, honor, glory, and power be unto Him that sitteth on the throne, and unto the Lamb, forever and ever." (Rev. 5:13.) And yet " it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." (Matt. 4:10.) While the Scriptures are so full of testimony res. pecting the exalted glory and majesty of Him " who spake as never man spake," they are none the less indicative that when he came down from heaven he laid aside the glory for which he prayed when he said, "And now, O Father., glorify thou me with thine own self, with the glory which I had with thee before the world was." who asks you what he must do t0 be WE find that we are not singular in finding that in our case the words of the Saviour prove true, " A man's foes shall be th^y of his own household."— Hardly anybody or class of persons exist who are not troubled with those who would thwart their every movement. The London Tablet thus refers to the ob- jections made by some illiterate and superstitious con- temporaries in its ranks :— " But for the outcry of a parcel of unknown el- derly gentlewomen, who shake and shiver in their shoes whenever the south wind blows, we have no sort of respect or consideration. If they wish, let them have a literature of their own, and be shut up with it air-tight, where no pestilential gale of higher principles and loftier influences can enter to disturb or blast. Within the limits of Law and Gospel let them make for themselves, as they can and how they can according to their discretion, a paradise like that where ' careless quiet lies, wrapt in eternal silence." Let them do for themselves and by themselves just what pleases them ; but in the name of common mod- esty, let them not presume to dictate to others and raise childish clamors against those who are more active and more knowing than themselves." Nov. 25, that " the original resolution condemned all war." The word " all " was not in it: it was sim- ply " war." The Harbinger has not yet retracted its attack on us as " comnander." Our readers will ex- cuse our reference to this, as we did not intend to re- fer to the Harbinger again, until we saw some symp- saved? Do you give him this answer, viz., Acts 2: 38, without any qualification, just as it reads?" Just so. We let the Bible speak for itself; but do not confine ourselves to a single passage. We take the Bible as it reads and have the whole harmonize on any given question THE BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON ; or the Word of God against the World. By J. P. WEETHEE. A quantity for sale. Price. 25 cts. per copy. Seud your orders, breUtren. Direct lo me, post paid, at Albany. The postage on each pamphlet, any distance, will be 41-2 cts. G. NEEDHAM. BUSINESS NOTES. O. Reuben—We will balance your account ou your sending what you feel able to. tS. Stearns, J. Foster, D. M. James, L. A. Miller, B. Stratton—Ali right. J. D. Wheeler—Correcled. Wm. S. Miller, 2tj cts.; and $2 72 for D. Bosworth. Will Bro. Bosworth write us what books lie had, as we donot find thecliarge. A. Sherwin. $5—Diagrams sent as directed. G. Needham, $10—Instead of the four, have charged you for six. Mrs. E. Spayd—The two $1 bills received are worth at the brokers but 25 cents each—leaving ®il 50 due. They may be worth more with you; we therefore reserve them subject to your order. J. W eston—At your request, we have again seut you the Herald. We discontinued it because we learned that you regarded those who took the paper as in a dangerous spiritual condition, and did not wish to put you in needless peril—what is not of faith being sin. J. Tillemore—It is $2 per vear. Have credited you in full. O. Olmstead—You can send what you feel able to. We have none of the Bible you describe. P. S. McCrac.ken—It would have been better to have enclosed it in the letter you seut directly to us. J.I. Steele—The last money received from J. V. Gordon was last March-leaving $1 50 due to 404, which we have now credited him. J. Blake, $5—It pays sixteen copies to 392, leaving $5 75 due at end ot the vol. P. Johnson—Letter by Bro. Hale-all right. J. Litch—Money ree'd by Dr. Spear. N. Reed—Sister M. is alive and well. BOOKS FOR SALE AT THIS OFFICE. SECOND ADVENT LIBRARY (in 8 vols.)-Pricc, $5perset. SECOND ADVENT LIBRARY (New Series/.-Each No. at 4 cts.; 371-2 cts. per doz.; #2 oO per hundred :— No. IV.-"GLORIFICATION." By the same. NO. V.-WM. MILLER'S APOLOGY AND DEFENCE. We are out of tracts Nos. 1, 2, and 3. " A STATEMENT OF FACTS on the Universal Spread and Ex- pected Triumphs of Roman Catholicism." 1j els.; tjplti per hundred. PROTESTANTISM; its Hope ol the World's Conversion Fal- lacious." 72 pp. Price 10 cts.; $'< per hundred. THE BIBLE A SUFFICIENT CREED By Charles Beccher. Price, 4 cts. MILLENNIAL HARP (with music.)-Price, 50cts ADVENT HiMNS (.wiliiout music;, 3 cts. ADDITKJA lO THE SOI l'Lt- MENT TO 'l'DE HARP VOU pp.), lo cts.; ml per doz. 'ADVENT SHIELD AND REVIEW " (Nos. 1, II, III.)-l'rice, 371-2 cts. single; $1 oO for the three bound together. QUESTIONS ON THE BOOK~ OF DANIEL (for the use of Bible-classes anu Sunday Schools.; Price, Ls1-2 cts. THE ADVENT HERALDI"~and the "MIDNIGHT CRY." We can supply most 01 the back volumes of these papers. THE RESTITUTION, Christ's Kingdom 011 Earth ; the Return of Israel, together with their Political Emancipation ; the Beast, Ins linage and Worstiip ; also, the Fall of Babylon, and tile Instruments 01 its Overthrow. By J. Litch. lsl pp. Price, bound, 371-2 cts.; stitched, to be sent by mail, 33 cts.; discount by the quantity. TRACTS ON PROPHECY. No. 1.—"Looking Forward." No.2.—" Present Dispensation-Its Course." 3.—" 1-resent Dispeusauou— Its End." 4.—" VWiat aid Paul Teach the Thessalouian Church ubout liis Second Coming 1" j.—" The Great Image." u.—" It 1 Vv ill that He '1 arrj till 1 Come." 7.—"What shall be the Sign ol Thy Coming?" 6.—•''Hie New Heavens and the New Earth." 9—"Christ our King." 10.-" be- hold, He Cometh with Clouds." 15 cts. per set; lj,i lor eight sets. DIAGRAMS OF THE VISIONS OF DANIEL AND JOHN. On paper (in three parts), without mounting, $4 ; on cloth (in one piece;, withoutroUer, On paper an three parts,,mounteu with rollers aud cloth backs, $6. These Diagrams cannot be sent by mail, but may be by express. "ANALYSIS OF GEOGRAPHY ; for the Use ofSchools, Acade- mies, 430; A. Miller, 404 ; J. G. Whipple,396 ; H. Vantyle, 404 ; .1. Pern"' 404 ; M. A. Qnimby, 408; L. Mussey, 404 ; N. Reed, 40); J. Brown, 418; D. Thayer, "389 ; J. Martin, 443 ; A. Johnson, 456 ; J. B. AtweU. 430—each $2 R. Wilber, 430 ; .1. Titteinore, 404 ; G. Russell, 430 i J. T. Home, 445 ; D. Smith (of Addison, Vt.), 43tl; M, Neslibit. 414, J. M. Carpenter, 412 ; E. Baldwin, 404 ; C. Aldrich, 404 ; S. land, 394 ; L. Martin, 450 ; M. C. Rogers, 404-each $3—J- (threecopies,) 37b-$3 due; F. Glanville, 404 ; J. Miller, 404 ; E- Aldrich, 420—each $4 1. Lanison, 456 ; Isaac Nichols, 2d, 430; Sadler, 503 ; C. Eiubrey, 404-each $5 Money received Jrom Deultry, $10—For Mrs. Hume, 411; G. Behman(411; J.Graham. 411; Mrs. E. Noilson, 411; S. Story, 3d, 411; I. Reed, 411; Cogswell, 411—each $1, leaving $3 for which we have no direction to whom to credit. Please direct. If it is to be applied to the seven remaining names equally, it will pay to No. 396.